this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
398 points (97.4% liked)

Comic Strips

24703 readers
2584 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13809164

Ignoring the lack of updates if the game is buggy, games back then were also more focused on quality and make gamers replay the game with unlockable features based on skills, not money. I can't count the number of times I played Metal Gear Solid games over and over to unlock new features playing the hardest difficulty and with handicap features, and also to find Easter eggs. Speaking of Easter eggs, you'd lose a number of hours exploring every nook and cranny finding them!

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Nostalgia makes us lie to ourselves.

Have you ever noticed that almost all of the retro games worth playing happen to be the ones you played back in the day? But the games you didn't play don't hold up? What a crazy coincidence.

Game design is better today than it has ever been, and it keeps improving. All those old mechanics still exist. You just don't have to slog through hours of bullshit to get to them anymore. Unless that's what you want, in which case that is also available.

If you want a manual, play Tunic. If you want punishing difficulty, play Hollow Knight. If you want to delve into new games with unknown mechanics that you figure out as you go, play UFO 50. There are so many options, and you never need to see a microtransaction unless you want to.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Most of the games I liked back in the day don't really hold up, though. Like, I loved the NES version of Strider back then; it had a strange and intriguing plot, I loved the trappings of the dragon-shaped space station and the plasma sword and the magnetic boots that let you walk on the ceiling, and I was a total sucker for any hint of metroidvania-type progression. But when I try to play it now, I notice the controls are awful, the collision detection is janky, the level designs are dull, and the "triangle jump" is nearly unusable.

Whereas I tried Clash at Demonhead, and that's surprisingly decent. A little simplistic, sure, and it bogs down as you get further into it, but it's pretty amusing. Same with Guardian Legend: I can't get through it, but I can definitely see the appeal. Edit: it may have been clear from context, but these are ones I didn't play back in my youth.

I do love indie stuff, though. I just played through Alwa's Legacy, and that one is quite good. (Some people might find it too easy, but I tend to appreciate that at this point. I don't have the reflexes I once did.)

So I tend to agree that there's still great stuff around. I just don't think nostalgia is the whole story with retro games. I think a lot of it has to do with the retro games being the work of a big studio, even though the mechanics today would be relegated to an indie studio. There are subtle ways that affects the experience, that I think people are unconsciously aware of.

But yeah, there are great games out there today, especially on PC.

[–] ericwdhs@discuss.online 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, despite some of the stuff happening in the AAA and hardware spaces, we're still in the golden age of gaming. I have a few favorite games from the 90s, but if I had to pick between everything released prior to 10 years ago and everything already released since, I'd still go with the latter without hesitating. I feel sad for anyone not finding enough new hits to feel the same.

[–] KarlHungus42@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Every game wasn't a blatant cash grab. I'd gladly give up updates in exchange for games that are complete upon release and have no pay to win or fomo elements.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

There are so many games like that out there. More than there have ever been. If you can't find them, you're not looking.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No game updates meant they sold a finished goddamn product, and if you found a glitch you could explore it. No online play meant there was no constant data collection for bug finding or license checks (for some games, in which the only way to opt out is not to play), and you weren't locked out of the single player or split screen co-op story if you disconnected the internet. Nowadays they're the fucking game police -- you must only play the exact way the devs intended, and your fun is heavily conditional.

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

I remember home computer and PC games coming in big boxes full of goodies. Especially RPGs often had a poster sized map, a story book, a monster guide and a manual. Also the copy protection often was a physical device like this rotating pirate head thing in Monkey Island, the manual itself or a card that was difficult to copy and could only be read with the included filter glasses.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Not based on money" As if quarter eaters and movie tie-in games haven't always been a thing. ET being a notable example.

Also have you played Deltarune?

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This brings me back. I grew up with older brothers, watching them play through games that I didn't have the skill to complete. I remember my oldest brother playing Donkey Kong Country and slapping nearly every spot on the ground to find hidden bananas/balloons, and exploring to find the hidden games and levels. I learned a lot by sitting back and watching until it was finally my turn to play.

I, myself, never made it to the Special world on Super Mario World, but my brothers did. I can't be sure if that's the first place I saw the words "gnarly" and "tubular," but only because Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles were equally as popular in our early 90s household and they definitely used that "surfer" language too. I just remember thinking those words sounded weird and funny, and have a strong mental connection between them and this game.

I don't really have a point to this comment, just reminiscing...

[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

I liked your anecdote, i was the older brother, takes me back ❀️

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

No microtransactions. Games were games. It's by no means inherent to games back then, and we could absolutely have that again. But, that would require gamers everywhere to suddenly not be whores to mini little dopamine hits like gambling and dark pattern addictions in order to push the industry's overton window back towards responsibility, respect, and integrity.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago
[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Came here for exactly this.

If you're the dad in this comic and you've never played Tunic, this is your wake-up call. One if the core mechanics of the game is collecting the pages for the instruction manual in game so you can figure out how to play.

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Infocom’s were the best.

You got sunglasses, a microscopic space fleet, a don’t panic pin, postcards, and something to read.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

a microscopic space fleet

can you expand on that, what exactly was that?

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In that case, it was an empty bag. There’s a gag in the game/book about a microscopic space fleet appearing and then getting eaten by a dog. The peril-sensitive sunglasses (which were supposed to turn black when there were dangerous situations) were made of black cardboard, etc. Low budget but hysterical.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks, i started to suspect something like that after the first few replies :-D It's been ages since i read those books, might be a good time to do it again since i seem to have forgotten quite a bit

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

It is of course well known that careless talk costs lives, but the full scale of the problem is not always appreciated.

For instance, at the very moment that Arthur said, 'I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle,' a freak wormhole opened up in the fabric of the space-time continuum and carried his words far far back in time across almost infinite reaches of space to a distant galaxy where strange and warlike beings were poised on the brink of a frightful interstellar battle.

The two opposing leaders were meeting for the last time.

A dreadful silence fell across the conference table as the commander of the Vl'hurgs, resplendent in his black jewelled battle shorts, gazed levelly at the G'Gugvuntt leader squatting opposite him in a cloud of green sweet-smelling steam, and, with a million sleek and horribly beweaponed star cruisers poised to unleash electric death at his single word of command, challenged the vile creature to take back what it had said about his mother.

The creature stirred in his sickly broiling vapour, and at that very moment the words, 'I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle' drifted across the conference table.

Unfortunately, in the Vl'hurg tongue this was the most dreadful insult imaginable, and there was nothing for it but to wage terrible war for centuries.

Eventually, of course, after their galaxy had been decimated over a few thousand years, it was realised that the whole thing had been a ghastly mistake, and so the two opposing battle fleets settled their few remaining differences in order to launch a joint attack on our own galaxy---now positively identified as the source of the offending remark.

For thousands more years the mighty ships tore across the empty wastes of space and finally dived screaming on to the first planet they came across---which happened to be Earth---where due to a terrible miscalculation of scale the entire battle fleet was accidentally swallowed by a small dog.

Those who study the complex interplay of cause and effect in the history of the universe say that this sort of thing is going on all the time, but that we are powerless to prevent it.

'It's just life,' they say.

Douglas Adams, The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Chapter 31.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It was a space fleet so small it was undetectable by currently available equipment.

Utterly priceless.

Something a small dog swallows, thus unwittingly averting interstellar war.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Use your imagination!

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

because shareholders were not involved

I remember spending ages reading the original Homeworld manual/ lore book.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Playing on the TV or a shared computer required social interaction to negotiate time, had other people see / watch you play, played together, etc. Playing games was a social activity. Contrast that with getting isolated into your own screen, all that happens is between you and Activision, Activision holding the leverage.

[–] M137@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are just wrong with both things in the title. Game mechanics weren't better, that's just objectively false. And replayability is very much dependent on the game, no matter when it's from.
My guess is that it's one of or both of these things that make you say that:
β€’ You only play AAA games, the most surface level boring shit that never does anything interesting.
β€’ You're under the spell of nostalgia, only remembering the very best from back when and not taking your memories into account for comparison.

There are so many great and interesting games being released, more than ever, with mechanics that couldn't even be imagined before. And as said, replayability is completely depending on what game, both old and new. There are tons of new games with infinite replayability, both with and without mods. There are so many games now that have so much, both in depth and wideness, that replaying them can feel like completely different games, that just couldn't exist before.

It's sad that so many of you seem to think this post is true, you're missing out by either not evem trying to find the good newer good stuff or being so deep into your nostalgia holes that nothing will ever be good. I feel sad for everyone who is stuck in both or either holes.

[–] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I've never sold any of my old games. I still have them all. I also still buy new ones. They're all good and I play them all. Sometimes older games are better, sometimes newer ones.