-
Yes........ in my opinion. The real answer is that it depends on the intended use of the system and the users' needs. It's as legitimate to treat
wheelas a catchall permissions group as it is to go around specifying permissions for specific users in your sudoers and udev rules -
From my understanding, the kernel tends to reuse the same names when attaching devices, but it's not required to do so by the specs (i.e. there may be cases where the
/devfile name changes depending on what you have plugged in). Hence why the common advice is to not specify/devfiles in yourfstab, and why people use udev rules instead ofchmodandchown-ing the/devfiles
Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Thanks!
-
I'm going to interpret this as such: it doesn't really matter, since - on my system - creating new groups require root privileges, requiring a superuser or a user part of
wheelanyway. This way, I can create a group with name that reflects its purpose, which in turn gives readability to the udev rule file. -
This makes sense. Thanks for the
fstabexample/reminder!
you're going to learn it better than 90% of people out there if you do all of this. lol
When you finished I wouldn't mind a Zusammenfassung.