this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
97 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2268 readers
992 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

shooting down a drone doesn't even harm anybody. in fact, you can only save lives by shooting it down

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Well, the only harm I see is that the US will then take more money from healthcare and education to build more drones.

How much does each of there drones cost in taxpayer $?

Update: unverified comments below say > $15 million per drone. That's a lot of kids with cancer that won't get cured

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah I love that I can just fully cheer for them to be shot down and I don't have to feel bad that soldiers are dying.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At 30 million a pop, that's almost a Billion already. What a waste

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are you getting your figure from an updated source? The article says:

“The Air Force announced its final five-year purchasing contract forReapers in 2020, and manufacturer General Atomics closed the production line last year after building 575 of them. The final lot cost about $16 million each when purchased in a batch of four, according to C. Mark Brinkley, a General Atomics spokesman.”

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

I had heard anywhere from 15-50 depending on load out, $30M is from Ars,

"military’s current reliance on drones and crewed aircraft, each costing more than $30 million,"

I might've been wrong, of course. Million here, million there, soon you're talking about real money

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Ok, $480,000,000

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, the us has demonstrated to the world how combat ineffective they are against a remotely developed country

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Our issue is that we have lots of bombs and no stomach at all for boots on the ground. (The last part is a good thing in my book). Hard to be effective with our politics and MIC

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Boots on the ground is worthless without air superiority, your positions will just get bombed/shelled constantly. The US has been unable to achieve that without assistance like it had in Iraq.

Small drones just make it that much harder since they can evade conventional anti-air defenses.

We need to see those numbers bumped up.

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

Keep up the good work!