this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
162 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31022 readers
2072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump denied disaster aid to four Democratic-led states in a move that is raising new questions about whether he’s injecting political motivations into emergency management decisions.

Trump on Friday rejected $227 million in aid requests from New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Rhode Island for help recovering from a major snowstorm in February. Two days earlier, Trump approved Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster aid for six Republican-led states, while extolling the political virtues of GOP politicians and candidates in the states.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why is Trump denying and approving aid in the first place though?

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because he does what he wants and no one stops him, just like he will with his third term.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because he micromanages. Because he's using the powers of the office for his own personal motives. And being mean to him is enough to trigger a response because he has the mental capabilities of a 5-year old.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Look, there is no reason to insult 5 year olds that way. Come on man. They're children.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No taxation without representation

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They could do with a movement that took it's name of this famous incident in Boston, where they refused to pay taxes on tea.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Isn't it great that people in taker states can vote for a dickhead like Donnie so he can deny money to maker states on behalf of the rubes in taker states?

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

New questions?

Bah. Trash reporting.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah these are very much not new and not questions. He's weaponizing the government against Democratic Americans. Totally cool thing for a President to do.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Oyml77@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Republicano

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"raising new questions"?

Anyone with one working synapse knows that he is doing it for political reasons and for personal spite. Probably in the opposite order.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I'm so sick of the media pretending he's a normal president and that every new atrocity is a new revelation that he's corrupt

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Are we done yet with pretending everything is normal in the Untied States?

[–] andrewmsc@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

billions for Israel zero for Massachusets. do you see it now?