this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
97 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86127 readers
2825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 33 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

the AI Safety Measures Act creates a framework that will require the “developers of the largest advanced AI systems” (read: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.) to provide public disclosures as to their safety practices, report any significant safety incidents, and remain in line with a set of compliance processes. It also creates a channel for whistleblowers working inside AI labs to safely and securely relay any safety concerns they might have without fear of repercussions.

Whoa this sounds pretty serious. It asks these companies to self report safety incidents and creates a "channel" for whistleblowers.

That's some serious hammer dropping. 🙄

OpenAI and Anthropic both endorsed the bill as it moved through the legislature

Of course they did because this is just the Democratic version of what Republicans do with regulatory capture. They just like to dress their version up with a facade of "consumer protections" when the law doesn't actually protect anyone or improve anything.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That requirement will apply to any AI company reporting more than $500 million in revenue.

This part right here makes it laughably simple for these companies to circumvent this law considering so many of these companies are operating at a loss. And it would only takes some creative accounting for them to just barely make just not enough to qualify.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 5 points 5 hours ago

"operating at a loss" =/= "low revenue"

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Those requirements are set to go into effect on January 1, 2028, now that the bill has been signed into law.

Why is he waiting 1.5 years to drop the hammer?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To give the companies plenty of time to build up a case that ties it up in courts for years. Meanwhile, he gets to use it for campaign propaganda.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Pritzker is a tool of AIPAC who dropped the proverbial nerf-hammer / rubber dildo

Fuxk him and Newsome and all the DNC

Because government moves at the speed of government

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think this just means that people won't build AI data centers there (for now), which is awesome for them tbh