this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

14269 readers
434 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Providing fodder for the "ermagerd, rust is evil" crowd, even though it has nothing to do with rust.

[–] somegeek@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No it's just a news about the pointless, corporate rust rewrite of GNU coreutils being a shitshow.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

uutils is rewritten by a corporation? Huh, TIL. I guess their website is wrong:

uutils is a community-driven, open-source effort maintained by volunteers around the world. There is no company behind it, just contributors who care about the future of foundational command-line tools.

[–] somegeek@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Claims are easy. Actions are what matters. rewriting FOSS program with GPL license under MIT license is only possible from either a corporate backed project (because it makes takeover of a lot of FOSS infra so much simpler for them), or an extremely stupid team. both cases are equally bad.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] somegeek@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago

Thanks! So probably, we can conclude that he's getting paid corporate money. Good for him, just a shame if others use it.

Btw, a very smart person can still make very stupid decisions.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh then it must be because of the MIT license!

/s

[–] Papierkorb@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's my biggest pet peeve with it honestly. My theory is still that it's a mistake that modern languages/tooling create a LICENSE file for you. In the before-times, when someone posted a project without then you told them and they educated themselves. Some chose GPL, some MIT, all fine, as long you do it with an educated mind. But now, the file gets created, technically legally binding contract of sorts, and the authors simply never bothered to check.

Change my mind: Linux is only still highly relevant because of GPL, not despite of.

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago

Cargo doesn’t create a LICENCE for you, and it doesn’t set the metadata like npm. It even tells you to go choose a license when you try to publish a crate without one

I agree with you on that one.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

The term "cuck license" for MIT and similar licenses is a good one IMO.