this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

4163 readers
40 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why do the article sites even exist anymore? Check out this link.

This is clearly a slop article. DDG results are chock full of this exact cookie cutter slop. Clearly if all I'm gonna find in search engines anymore is slop, I might as well just go straight to the source, right? How is this business model viable anymore?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

I think you forgot to finish the question in the post title

[–] pnwpixel@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Indie/smallweb is promising and is growing.

https://indieweb.org/

There are indieweb dedicated spaces to search for these sites. Such as https://theindex.fyi/

It's a return to a very non-corporate web experience.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

On DDG, You can send feedback about each result. I dunno if it actually does any good.

  • tap the three dot button next to the result
  • tap “share feedback about this site”
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Ooooh thanks for this!

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The search results only have slop articles because it's increasingly difficult to find anything else. I heard that recent estimates are indicating about 50% of the content of the internet is already AI generated, and it's only going to get worse, and it's going to keep getting worse very rapidly. "Search" in the way we understand it is obsolete. I don't know what the future of content discovery for real humans is going to look like, but I'm confident it's not going to look anything like search. That's broken and it's never coming back.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

I don’t know what the future of content discovery for real humans is going to look like, but I’m confident it’s not going to look anything like search. That’s broken and it’s never coming back.

We should go back to web rings and curated lists of useful links.

Us internet dinosaurs remember those days. It kind of sucked, but it would defeat the slop if you only link to human-made websites and those websites only link to human-made websites, etc.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

Might as well just go straight to the source ... if you can find the source ... if the source isn't just more slop.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried noai.DuckDuckGo.com? I’m curious if it gives different results.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure that just disables DDG's AI. It doesn't do anything to filter out AI articles.

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's funny. I do the opposite. I use the AI to do the searching and finding results of suitable quality is part of the prompt....

[–] Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

^This

Unless your AI is grok or meta obviously