A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 30 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.
Resources:
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Hoplyra is an open-source (MIT) dashboard for VPN on your own VPS infrastructure. Features:
Self-hosted. No signup. No SaaS backend.
Install:
git clone https://github.com/Linchevatel/Hoplyra.git
cd Hoplyra
sudo apt install make python3-venv podman podman-compose
make install
@Linchevatel@lemmy.world, the community has provided a clear preference for a minimum account age before advertising a project here.
I would encourage you to engage with the community and get to know them before you post again so it can be met with a more positive response.
Hey folks, as a reminder f/loss with no payment required to run in full is an exception for removal, so this post is approved.
As mentioned in other threads (and the recently added tagging meta), I am aware people would like a better way to handle AI assisted project postings. I'm working on that in the meantime for posting this weekend to be the upcoming week's discussion, and looking into some tools to help with presenting a few options to be voted on.
@linchevatel@lemmy.world in the meantime, I would really recommend you adding how and where you used AI in development in your post.
The problem I have with this is it's the pornography argument. You know it's slop when you see it.
I appreciate rule 7 being updated, but time will tell if all slop projects just learn to wriggle around these rules. It just leaves a bad taste. I've started losing trust in any project I find on here, especially when its posted in the above manner.
This is why there is a new discussion incoming for this - we're kind of threading the needle here to find the right fit. Previously this wasn't an issue because everything (including a bunch of entirely valid posts) were getting removed by the prior mod under rule 3, which caused a whole other problem (and led to me modding - which is your latest problem! :) )
AI disclosure discussion will be up over the weekend for community comment/discussion/planning.
And your efforts are very appreciated! I hope there can be a rule to keep useful content while not creating a ton of burden on the mod(s).
Singular for now, the others on the list either haven't existed for 3 years or haven't done anything here, but part of that is my fault. A few folks have stepped up to help in my off hours, but I haven't had a chance to check them out fully yet with the rest of the shenanigans going on lately. Hopefully something I'll be addressing on Saturday....
AI was used only for code review. AI was not used to write the code.
I'm just going to say that from my quick look across the site and code I would have a hard time believing that, for a variety of reasons. I suspect others will have a similar take.
The website looks AI generated to me as well. The style and especially the purple really give it that token AI look.
(Just pointing it out, not in a negative way, not implying anything)
Heavy agree with this, and that the source is shown in three locations(duplicate info is all over the page) as well as the heavy push into how fast deploying the software is, when that's not usually a metric anyone actually cares about as its a one and done setup
Disclaimer: AI assisted by Cursor.
Is not disclaimed anywhere other than cursoragent co-authered the 1 commit in the repo at this time.
It's another brand new account posting a slop code project without any mention, yay
Ai slop and MIT
For someone who isn't well versed in open source licensing, what's wrong with MIT? What's a good alternative?
EDIT: Thank you gooeyglob@lemmy.world for answering Q1 in another thread
You need to read the room, dude. Look at the current most active discussions.
Remember to report. Rule 7
Its fully open source with no payment required, so it doesn't violate rule 7.
AI disclosure is a new discussion starting this weekend.
Edit: Please take a look at this post here: https://lemmy.world/post/48636804