this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
68 points (97.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26881 readers
252 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

And they didn't even need traffic cameras to do it. Just made different choices for their road design...

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

I prefer traffic circles, but this is a step in the right direction and can be retrofit to the car-centric US infrastructure to make it just a little less pedestrian hostile.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

that is very interesting.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Or we can fit 2 more paid parking spaces and allow a private company to leach off the city’s residents.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 31 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

The 20 dollar fix: 2 bollards near intersections to stop people from parking where they force bikes to swerved in front of distracted drivers and block pedestrians from the view of drivers.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

You mean some paint on the ground isn't enough to protect a human from a 2 ton hunk of metal on wheels driven by an idiot that's not paying attention?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They used plastic bollards that can't stop them either, but the psychological effect stopped them from parking there.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

That, and the damage the bollards will do to the car of whatever asshole that may run over them

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

$20.00? For government work? I'd like to see some receipts

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 6 points 20 hours ago

Presumably thats where the journalist got the 20 dollar per intersection number.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

and just in the back: a car parked on the cycling lane

[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Most city mangers today: Not cost effective.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

1 thing to note here is that Hoboken is a very very dense city and very hard to drive around in. Due to this many people are already driving extremely slower than other places. Im not denying that this works, but i dont think other cities will have the success that they did for the same fix. For example it's neighboring city Jersey City would be a much better example for this and I hope they get to try, but that city is much bigger than Hoboken and not as uniform with the grid system which makes foe a lot more variablea. Still even if it saves 1 life its still worth it, especially if it only costs around $20 an intersection to find out.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

It's still increasing visibility, particularly for when a car turns, where they're going to be moving slower anyways

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if there are any examples of cities with faster traffic trying to implement similar changes.

[–] Spot@startrek.website 2 points 16 hours ago

Not quite the same but, near me there is an on-ramp for a highway that they added a turn lane onto. They used an existing straight lane and added lines and arrows to denote the change. No one heeded these new lane rules so they added a row of standing, plastic, reflective Ballard like lane dividers to separate the turn lanes from the others. They were quickly driven over by all the traffic and no longer exist.