this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
154 points (94.8% liked)

politics

30038 readers
3347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I can't believe people would rather have Susan Collins over an imperfect progressive.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not mixed at all. I want a progressive who won't back down from MAGAs, who won't be intimidated, who won't be polite, who will have the courage to crush MAGA.

If he does those things, and later starts getting weird, we'll deal with him then, but right now we need strong courageous warriors, not polite weenies like Schmuck.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

How have you dealt with Fetterman, exactly?

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (42 children)

Anybody who has mixed feelings about him need to listen to his interview with Jon Stewart on the Weekly Show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itNjgCJDxU

MSM/Corporate Media are doing a massive smear campaign on him because he's railing against the Iran war and against Israel's incursions. The money machine is stacking against him and he needs as much support as possible. The tattoo is a red herring.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (10 children)

MSM/Corporate Media are doing a massive smear campaign on him because he’s railing against the Iran war and against Israel’s incursions.

What is infuriating about Platner isn't that his rhetoric is bad or that his totenkomf is "fake news" or whatever. It's that it really is just Platner or actual fascists.

In a better world, Platner would not be a viable candidate, because he'd be running against a dozen Zohran Mamdani's. In this world, it's Platner versus The Genocide Machine.

And I'm not going to vote for the Genocide Machine.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
[–] tresspass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The elites are my enemy and they are doing everything to make sure he doesn't get elected. Voting literally costs you nothing. It seems obvious. Are the Platner haters even real people? Are they even from Maine?

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I'm enjoying seeing all the people that yelled at me for not supporting Harris come up with reasons to not support Planter and how this is totally different.

[–] Legonatic@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (8 children)

The mental gymnastics of purity tests for every candidate are going to be the downfall of American democracy.

I understand distrust in politicians, but come on, this isn't a case of the lesser of two evils. It's a regular guy who is putting forth progressive policy ideas and a proven supporter of everything wrong with modern politics. Not to mention, Collins does almost nothing for her constituents anymore and is so out of touch it's absurd.

Mainers fortunately don't care about the purity test nonsense.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

Every time I get into it with one of these people online it goes exactly the same way:

Them, acting like Nazis and pointing fingers: "Platner has NAZI tattoos!"

Me: [pointing out that Platner is up against literal fascists, building concentration camps and filling them with immigrants; Hegseth has proven and unambiguous Nazi tats and acts like a Nazi; etc]

Them: "But his tattoos! His TATTOOOOOOS!"

It's all they have. And if they don't care about Hegseth's multiple Nazi/white nationalist tats, don't even have an answer for them, then why should I care about Platner's? Without the actual ideology behind it, it's just ink, and it's pretty clear that whatever Platner is, he's not an ideological Nazi, so I don't give a good goddamn how many tats Platner has.

So now every time these motherfuckers start pearl-clutching about Platner, a voice reaches up from the past in my head and softly says,

"I believe that the president has learned from this case. The president has been impeached. That’s a pretty big lesson.”

That little voice never fails. Bless Susan Collins for that turd of wisdom she dropped back in 2020 as sufficient reason not to convict in the Senate impeachment trial, because that same stupid ass line is still ringing through the years. Trump did indeed learn his lesson: that Susan Collins would never act to lift a finger against him.

I wouldn't vote for Mills, either. But Collins is not worthy of the office, nor of the great state that sent her. Maine can do better. I'd vote for Platner just because of Collins.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Centrists and authoritarian leftists are scary man. We've got terrorist rape-ublicans to deal with already.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48239454

https://mander.xyz/post/53015076

Meanwhile, they really didn't like that I've actually read Marx and Lenin and used it against them

https://lemmy.zip/comment/26868546

And this feels like the best image to describe it so far.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›