this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
48 points (92.9% liked)

factoid - fascinating, bite-sized facts and trivia

109 readers
1 users here now

Community Rules

  1. Keep it factual: All posts must contain verifiable facts or trivia.
  2. No reposts: Check if your fact has been shared recently before
  3. Respect diversity: Facts from all fields of knowledge are welcome.
  4. Be civil: Treat other community members with respect.
  5. Tag NSFW facts: also try not to be overly graphic with the title.
  6. Report violations: Help moderators by reporting rule-breaking content.

Posting Guidelines:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

My dumb ass: “how the fuck are they organizing this what the he…. Oh it’s… just the map I am stupid.”

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, me too. This thing is organized really lame

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I need to visit rhode island then. Didn't realize NJ was so close we share a border lol

[–] Starik@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My conception of the Dakotas was way off.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's mostly open plains out there. The far western sides get the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, and South Dakota has the Badlands, but most of those states are long expanses of flat prairie that feel like they go on forever.

[–] Starik@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I guess I was thinking of the landscape around Deadwood.

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Can someone explain to the difference between "by area" and "by percentage", please?

Certainly, if "by area" is "state with the most unforested land", then it's not Delaware (a small state), it's either a Dakota or California/Texas/Alaska (just by virtue of being huge).

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Alaska would beat California and Texas combined with sheer acreage.

I cannot figure out what their metric was.

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Realized that as you were typing and edited my comment.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

If Texas beats the other lower 48 in terms of total forest area, and only beats Alaska by a single percentage point in terms of percent area, then Alaska absolutely owns Texas in terms of total forest area.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

they should put the percentages inside the buckets, but raw counts underneath. I have no idea if Florida is smaller than Nebraska

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now count what's actual nature and what's merely a wood plantation.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

Sometimes the line between those two is pretty blurred.

Some forests are regularly harvested for wood every few decades, but grow pretty much entirely wild in the meantime.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Wooo yeah NJ! Go Pine Barrens!