this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

65656 readers
273 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh, cool! Red Hat! The people who run a company charging for support. This makes me feel very safe.

Ever since the ssh thing, but especially in the last few months, I really don't feel safe with anything on the internet.

[–] badmin@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dare I ask, what ssh thing?


Side Note: It was already believed that SSH encryption was broken by state actors since the first NSA leaks. So, people should at least always use it over another encrypted channel anyway.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 22 hours ago

YES! This was a huge deal that what a lucky mishap rather than a sign of good security.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

Btw, Jia Tan is an awesome software dev that you should hire. /s

We're all completely pwned. That's the only way to feel ok for me. My info has been compromised tons of times and no one notified me. I just accept it. I practice good security and I know that some of the companies on the other side don't. I can't change that.

Have you accepted that you're gonna die? If yes, you should adopt this attitude. If not, I'm sorry that you're so afraid of the natural process. Try to be healthy. Try to be secure. Accept that you're gonna die or get pwned or both. It's a lot healthier mindset (IMO).

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can we all stop using npm at this point?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure but npm is a target due to reach. Its happened with Python too.

[–] fschaupp@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

So, lets all switch to Rust and use cargo.. Oh, fuuu, wait, how about maven, they too? .... It's in the nature of the thing. Assess your dependencies and get your SBOM monitored.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I can't decide if this is real or an advertisement for the linked article service. I don't see any CVE in the article which seems to be a good indication of the quality of the content.

I'm not saying that this is misinformation, but I'm extremely sceptical about the nature of this article.

[–] calidris@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

This definitely has the feel of an ad.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 3 points 6 days ago

Like Inception.

The article service that talks about a compromise to steal credentials that secretly steals your credentials.

"would you still love me if I was a credential thief?"

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a compromise between Red Hat and the Hacker.

[–] Kristof12@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Not so much of a problem then

[–] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not a computer guy; did not know there was such a thing as a npm package. From the article, it looks like this is a GitHub based problem. No?

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Redhat employee had leaked credentials, threat actor used those credentials to push some files to GitHub, which executed the code in a GitHub action which had trusted access to publish to NPM.

Essentially, an employee got owned and someone used their access (that they already had) to publish the nefarious code.

You'll see GitHub Actions in these often, as that's how a lot of big open source organizations publish their packages and run tests/deployments. It's less of a "GitHub based problem" and more of a "trust boundary problem", if they used other services, the same problem could likely have still been successful.

Thx for the explanation.