The human eye can only see 999 FPS /s
this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)
Monitors
860 readers
35 users here now
All things related to monitor hardware; desktop monitors, portable monitors, projectors, monitor technology and monitor business news.
Other hardware communities across Threadi:
- Augmented Reality
- Hardware
- Gaming Laptops
- Laptops
- Linux Hardware
- Mechanical Keyboards
- Raspberry Pi
- Retro Computing
- Virtual Reality
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Piefed.social rules: https://piefed.social/rules
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, topics adjacent to monitor hardware are fine.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Icon by "Bartama Graphic"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Frames per second per sarcasm
Yeah, it's the rolling of the eyes that really limits it.
no clue.. I have 144 and usually don't even have it enabled.
meanwhile i got my first 165hz monitor and now i get all snooty when games are capped at 60
Low Perceived motion blur looks amazing. I only seen 165hz and I can imagine how much better that would look (when or if we uncouple framerate from performance like i heard from Intel gpu guy)
when or if we uncouple framerate from performance like i heard from Intel gpu guy
Was he talking about frame generation? Otherwise I don’t really see how that’s supposed to happen.
"full 1080p" - Big whoop, that's rookie numbers of pixels