this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11234 readers
846 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EU lawmakers and member states reached a deal early on Wednesday to implement the bloc’s trade pact with the United States, ending months of wrangling over the accord as President Donald Trump threatened fresh tariffs unless it was approved by July 4. The compromise followed late-night negotiations between EU capitals and parliament negotiators.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weaselsrippedmyflesh@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to lawmakers, parliament agreed to scale back its demands – and the final text notably gave the United States until the end of the year to drop surtaxes above 15 percent on steel components, rather than insisting on it as a precondition.

The EU has absolutely no spine. This level of appeasement will only be rewarded with further scorn and disdain.

[–] farsinuce@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The politicians and diplomats behind the negotiations MUST know something crucial that simply isn't surfaced to the public.

I think back then, everyone was afraid the US would cut the military support for Ukraine. But since they are now cutting it anyway and are pulling troops from Europe I think this is not relevant anymore. I do not see any benefits left.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Some time ago I was hiring using some European funding. I got this very good Iranian candidate. There was no way to hire him as the US forced the EU not to allow hiring Iranians with European funding.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Yah sure. They dont want to loose money.

[–] stoicEuropean@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am usually very much pro-EU, since I think it is the best project that ever evolved on this continent. But in some cases, I am deeply ashamed of my European supergovernment. This is one of them.

Can someone with more knowledge tell me If there is some hidden strategy?

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I won't claim to have more knowledge than you, just more optimism. Let's stick to the car example and say you're a European looking to buy a car. You can choose between a petrol-guzzling American-made monster of a car and a reasonably efficient European-made ICE car or EV. Even if I "sweeten the deal" for you by slashing import tariffs, making the American car a little cheaper, you're not a complete buffoon (unlike the American President). You know that whatever you "saved" on your initial purchase will be eaten up by European petrol prices in no time - particularly if the orange moron destabilises even more oil-producing regions. So you're not going to buy the American-made car, 0% tariff be damned.

This might have been what the EU negotiators went with: "Let's give the idiot the larger number if it makes him happy. It will have little to no effect."

[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still not looking forward to people driving around with the ToddlerSlayer F150 or whatever

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

eh, good luck trying to park that thing in any city in NL

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Does anyone know whether the mutual acceptance of each others vehicle standards is still part of this agreement?

Back in August / September there was reporting that, as part of the trade deal, both parties would "accept and mutually recognise each others norms for cars" and that "the agreement voices a desire to align vehicle regulations"

https://brusselsenieuwe.nl/europese-steden-slaan-alarm-grote-amerikaanse-autos-horen-niet-op-onze-weg/

I really do not want those massive American death-machines on European roads. It would undo decades of work making European roads safer.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The orange cunt will be back for more.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As part of the trade agreement, Europe requires America to honour and implement their part of the agreement as well. If Trump starts raising tariffs again that would be a clear breach of the trade agreement, and Europe no longer has an obligation to honour their end of the deal either.

There is also an expiration date in the trade agreement for 2029, if I'm understanding correctly

[–] Chemo@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

If Trump starts raising tariffs again that would be a clear breach of the trade agreement, and Europe no longer has an obligation to honour their end of the deal either.

Maybe that's the idea here: Trump will break the deal anyway, so it doesn't really matter what it says.