this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
-1 points (40.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

100 readers
20 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This is how a literature review and critique is done, just talking about the power, scope, and gaps in data. No name calling, just a discussion of what data is available.

TLDW - a MD makes a pro-seed oil video, and Westman goes over the strength and applicability of their evidence to a ketogenic population, intermediate markers, and confounders.

Seed-oils are a problem, but they are less impactful than hyperi-insulinemia - So if you can only fix one, fix the carbohydrate intake.

Seed oils have become one of the most controversial topics in nutrition, with people online calling them toxic, inflammatory, and one of the biggest drivers of modern disease. In this video, Dr. Eric Westman reacts to Dr. Brad Stanfield’s evidence-based breakdown of the seed oil debate and examines whether the science actually supports the fear. The discussion covers where the anti-seed oil concerns came from, including the history of replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fats, the omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, heating seed oils, oxidation, trans fats, and the role of processed food. Dr. Westman also explains why this debate can be confusing in the context of low-carb and keto metabolism, where the effects of carbohydrates, glucose, insulin, and metabolic syndrome may matter far more than many people realize. This is a nuanced discussion on butter, margarine, seed oils, inflammation, heart disease risk, and what the clinical relevance of all this may actually be in the real world. If you’ve been wondering whether seed oils are truly dangerous or whether the internet has overblown the issue, this video will help you think through the evidence more clearly.

summerizerSeed oils and the real target

  • The video starts with the question of whether internet warnings about seed oils being toxic, inflammatory, and terrible for health are wrong.
  • Seed oils are common cooking and processed-food fats from soybean, corn, sunflower, and similar seeds; olive oil is separate because it comes from fruit.
  • Westman agrees that seed oils are overrated as a proven problem, because clinical trials have not nailed down seed oils as an independent risk.
  • The practical problem is ultra-processed food, takeaway food, repeated high-heat frying, and carb-heavy junk food. Historical shift from saturated fat to seed oils
  • The low-fat era pushed people away from butter, lard, and animal fats and toward margarine, seed oils, and higher-carbohydrate foods.
  • That shift followed weak science against saturated fat and helped build the processed-food environment that came with obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.
  • Stanfield stays closer to the old saturated-fat paradigm, where moving away from saturated fat is tied to heart-health improvement.
  • Westman's view is that insulin resistance, glucose, insulin, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes matter more than saturated fat in food. Omega-3, omega-6, and inflammation
  • Linoleic acid is an essential omega-6 fat, so the issue cannot be simplified into omega-6 is bad and omega-3 is good.
  • The omega-3 to omega-6 ratio made sense to Westman historically, especially through low-carb teaching about membranes and inflammation.
  • Test-tube and animal mechanisms can look plausible, but the clinical question is whether they matter in humans eating real diets.
  • The ratio concern is often an omega-3 intake problem, not proof that normal omega-6 intake causes widespread inflammation. Human trials, clinical relevance, and low-carb metabolism
  • Stanfield cites a 10-week randomized trial where obese participants eating more omega-6 seed oils had less liver fat, lower inflammation, and lower insulin than the saturated-fat group.
  • Stanfield also cites a 2017 meta-analysis of 30 randomized trials finding no meaningful increase in inflammatory markers from higher linoleic acid intake.
  • Population evidence is used to connect higher linoleic acid intake with lower diabetes and heart-disease risk.
  • Westman handles those findings cautiously because most trials study carbohydrate eaters, not people in low-carb, keto, or carnivore-like metabolism.
  • Low-carb metabolism changes fat handling; Phinney, Volek, and Forsythe showed that higher-fat low-carb diets can have lower circulating fat markers than lower-fat high-carb diets.
  • The Cochrane saturated-fat review shows a cardiovascular-event reduction, but the absolute effect is not huge and the subjects were generally carbohydrate eaters.
  • Books by Gary Taubes and Nina Teicholz lay out the weak saturated-fat and LDL case that belongs to the old paradigm. Heating seed oils, trans fats, and oxidation
  • Early hydrogenated margarines created trans fats and added confusion to the seed-oil and heart-health story.
  • Westman does not accept that the trans-fat association was as large as the public story made it, and he still rejects the saturated-fat avoidance logic behind it.
  • A 2022 meta-analysis found that heating oils below 200°C did not create meaningful trans fats, while very high or prolonged heating did.
  • A sunflower-oil heating study found only small oxidation changes, while repeatedly heated oil in a fryer-like setting increased inflammatory markers.
  • The everyday concern is not fresh seed oil on a salad; it is repeatedly heated oil inside fries, takeaways, and processed foods. Final practical view
  • Westman agrees with Stanfield that seed oils are not a proven central risk and that cutting junk food is a good move.
  • Westman disagrees with Stanfield that moving away from saturated fat is strongly supported for everyone, especially in low-carb metabolism.
  • In Westman's clinical lens, glucose, insulin, A1C, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome are more measurable and more powerful than seed-oil tracking.
  • When patients reverse very high A1C with food changes while eating more saturated fat and without targeting seed oils, seed-oil avoidance cannot be the main explanation.
  • More follow-up and published results are still needed, and people with success should share outcomes from the metabolic approach.

References

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For me the big take away is you have to actually understand what you are citing to be able to have a meaningful discussion. If you don't know the weaknesses and gaps in your own evidence you can end up making broad generalizations that are not actually applicable to the people you are talking to.

I.E. a pile of 50 papers with some shared keywords does not a make a cogent consistent hypothesis


I'm still amazed people who are pro-whole-foods, still promote seed oils - which are one of the most processed compounds known to man (and they didn't exist 150 years ago, so the burden of no-harm should be on the seed oil promoter)


Are seed oils the big bad? no, probably not. Are they necessary? No, demonstrably so (humans existed > 150 years ago when they were invented).