this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
1 points (55.6% liked)

Europe

6586 readers
61 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

Look at all those chauvinists going extremely mad at mere possibility of being exposed to a plurality of views.

I wanted to ask if we can block rt.com.

And then I saw what instance that community was on.

So... ...feel free to downvote Putin's bootlickers.

[–] 00xide@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

RT, the Russian state media outlet, is annoyed that after 50 years of Germany responding to open threats with inaction, they've decided to have a military again.

In other news, the sun rose today.

[–] m532@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

Nazis should never have a military.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

digging through the freedom of information act files has made me wonder if the clear biases from state media is less worse than the biases from ostensibly independent media whose biases are just as state aligned as state media, but better hidden from the public (eg new york times, bbc, npr, cnn, le monde, der speigel, etc).

it's easy to dismiss like fox news in this regard because they're just as transparent as sometime like rt; but it's much harder to dismiss npr or the bbc because it looks like they're neutral when, in fact, they both have storied history of regurgitating american and western state narratives.

it seems that pretending to be neutral, but actually disseminating state propaganda is several orders of magnitude more evil to me and a much bigger danger humanity than something like rt can ever be.