More accurate to say if you have downloaded Cemu for Linux between 6-12 May and either unzipped it or run the appimage you are assumed to be infected.
RetroGaming
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
From their messag:
There are currently no known reliable traces
Isn't a checksum of the files a reliable enough way to check? Edit: Ah yes, at the bottom of their message they do exactly that. If one executed the programs, then they are affected I assume:
If you are unsure whether your binaries are compromised here are hashes of the GOOD files:
Cemu-2.6-x86_64.AppImage 0c20c4aeb800bb13d9bab9474ef45a6f8fcde6402cad9b32ac2a1bbd03186313 (sha256)
cemu-2.6-ubuntu-22.04-x64.zip 5e4592d0dae394fa0614cb8c875eff3f81b23170b349511de318d9caf7215e1b (sha256)
I think they were saying there's no way to trace if the malware activated or what files it affected, but you can determine if you have the infected versions by the checksums yeah.
But people kept defending appimage saying it's safer and sandboxed and stuff. Think any will show up in replies to double down on that clearly wrong idea?
Oh no AppImage is not sandboxed, people didn't say that. You probably mean people say Flatpak is sandboxed. And the Flatpak version here is not affected. I personally use AppImages too, knowing its not sandboxed at all and aware of the dangers. AppImage is "just" like a self extracting Zip archive, but with some extra tricks. Flatpak on the other hand is sandboxed and limits the access to your system and files, depending on the configuration of the package.