this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
80 points (89.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

42111 readers
226 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

I prefer to always see both numbers.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] 123@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago

Wow, that exploded, it's now at -47.

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's ok, I can tell you. Your comment currently has 10 upvotes. Check in tomorrow for an update.

Edit: 21 now

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Size is what's important, direction is meaningless.

100 upvotes, hell yeah

100 downvotes, hell yeah

50 upvotes, 50 downvotes, hell yeah

0 votes, aw man

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If size is important, i'd rather have 1 really big upvote than 100 little ones.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you rather fight one horse-sized upvote or 100 duck-sized downvotes?

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

Gimme the horse!!!!

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

How hard I slam my left mouse button on a vote should be graphically represented.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone -1 points 1 week ago

You fool!

How can 1 big vote ever compete with 100 little ones, there are simply too many. Like a swarm of ants

[–] WongKaKui@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Oh yea 0 votes is so sad... I wonder if federation is broken or I got shadowbanned or something...

I think the thing is not about the score, its just an affirmation that, yes, someone in the world did hear you and you didn't decrease the lifespan of your keyboard for no reason...

But I'd rather have a "read by [X] Users" stat that is neutral, rather than a negative stat like a downvote...

Getting downvoted feels like when you were in K-12 school and the entire class bullying you

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Because we all want to be liked 😊

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

No I don't care at all

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is presumably the logic other social media platforms applied when deciding to remove separate visibility of downvotes.

By just showing the aggregate, the poster usually gets to feel better about themselves and still see a positive score ("People like my post!") even if there are also some downvotes.

And so the poster keeps posting that sort of stuff.

From a commercial perspective this is good, especially because 'controversial' content with mixed upvotes and downvotes drives more engagement and more 'clicks'

Hopefully on lemmy we can stay free from that revenue-brained thinking given we have no profit motive, and keep scores transparent.

(It seems many Lemmy apps already show scores as just a merged aggregate however. Perhaps they simply copied the look of the big players, thought it looked 'tidier', or didn't even consider why it might be better if they didn't.)

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I am frequently baffled by what people here downvote.

ETA: including this post.