this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4990 readers
160 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 0 points 2 hours ago

Capitalism prefers to outsource the child rearing to developing nations.

It welcomes immigration for young adults who are ready to be wage slave / tax payers.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah cant you wait a few years for the housing market to go back to down?

Its been 6 years since covid when will it go back? Women cant have kids like men. There is an upper age limit eventually. Its like being punished for being responsible. Really makes me want to :: blocked by lemmy ::

[–] porcelainpitcher@lemmy.today 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's men, too. Sperm count and more importantly quality deteriorates. So both sexes are on the biological clock.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I dk if i can see it as comparable. The lower chance for men is still way better than 0 chance for women. I know a few blokes who had kids in 60s but 0 women in that age would be able to naturally.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You made me curious because I know of some outlier cases where post-menopausal women have had natural pregnancies.

On 20 August 1997, Dawn Brooke (UK) became the oldest natural mother when she gave birth to a son by Caesarian section at the age of 59 years. She conceived accidentally, having managed to ovulate past her last period.

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/oldest-mother-to-conceive-naturally-

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Never heard of post-menopause pregnancy. Feels like body said we not done yet lol.

[–] Watermark710@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Not quite the same thing, but my mom had my older siblings when she was between 15 and 21 years old. The delivery she had at 21 was complicated and traumatic. Doctors told her she'd never be able to have another child. 17 years later, she goes to the doctor and they find me in her belly. Life damn sure finds a way.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 15 hours ago

Not comparable in any way. 80 year old men can get women pregnant. Women generally have extreme trouble getting pregnant at half that age.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is a sad situation for Australia on many accounts. It would help if more employment was made available in regional areas where there is still space and prices for housing are relatively affordable.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

This is not just Australia. This is repeated across every single developed economy. The problem is capitalism. This is the expected result when every aspect of life is aggressively commoditised. When our political class collude with corporations to extract value from the people, rather than improve their quality of life and standard of living.

[–] null@lemmy.org 6 points 17 hours ago

It's now a seemingly common trend in developed nations. Old people voted against social programs nationally and vetoed housing development locally then wonder why the children they voted out of existence aren't around.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Im 61, i decided another I nor the planet could afford kids 40 years aho and had a vasectomy.

over those 40 years endless articles about people not producing more grist for the mill

A nice goal would be a planet with 100 million at most

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 5 points 13 hours ago

Well the last time the global population was around 100 million was over 2000 years ago, so I think that asking for a 99% reduction in human life is screaming eco-fascist

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub -3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

A planet with 100 million at fucking most? Are you stupid or something?

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 6 points 16 hours ago

You'll need to outline your objections more clearly.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

If you don’t want kids, and you have a vasectomy, that would mean you’re fucking smart.

[–] porcelainpitcher@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

We're not worried.