this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
34 points (73.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3203 readers
26 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes. Look at the 'Proletariat' woman's arms. lmao Whoever made this didn't give a single, solitary fuck.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the way genAI draws cartoons is incredibly uncanny valley and I can't figure out exactly why

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's this incredibly generic, smooth, stereotypical style.

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Denigration of the lumpenproleteriat... Those most excluded from the system are best able to imagine life beyond and outside it and build support networks not based in capitalism.

Putting (some) of the workers in charge of the means of production doesn't solve the problems, it merely ameliorates them for a while a new ruling class emerges from the revolutionary vanguard while switches places with the previous ruling class.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also glorifies work as an absolute moral good, when it's long past time to be winding it down as automation takes the load. Why the fuck are average working hours going up?

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

While I agree hours probably shouldn't be going up, I think there's a bit of a ratcheting effect at play.

If you take the classic "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs", you end up with the question of how you define 'needs'.

As tech gets better, the standard of care goes up in healthcare - treatments that were 'impractical' 20 years ago are now expected standard of care. Same goes for safety and for standard of living. Electric lighting, aircon, floor space, your own bedroom not shared with 3 other kids, TV/telephone/internet. It's now basically standard in first world countries to fully treat sewage and have aircon on buses - that wasn't the case 50 years ago.

Every time automation displaces some drudge work, we'll be able to find something new that technically could be done and would be nice to have. 30 years later people will be screaming bloody murder if that former nice-to-have breaks down.

That's certainly not to say we're efficiently using the labour we have.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whatever AI made this forgot the other class of people: useful idiots who have formed a dependence corporate technology and services for even the most basic tasks.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

Lazy to assume all graphics are AI. What ai existed in 2017 that would have produced these results?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

This is too oversimplified (and the images are very anachronistic and stereotypical due to sloppiness)

It lacks the role of the state as the force which regulates the tension between capitalists and proletariat.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ew slop. no thanks. I prefer working people

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's so lazy to assume any graphics are AI. A simple reverse igame search could have prevented this comment

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

A simple reverse igame search could have prevented this comment

The fuck it would've. Either your screenshot is wrong or fabricated, and it's telling you didn't provide a link.

A Facebook screenshot from Philosophical Thoughts account (same as watermark) from April 27, 2026

You've seen the arms, and there's no way you thought: "Yeah, surely a real human did that; I need to go investigate to prove it." You can just admit it's AI slop.

[–] parlaptie@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

So basically this is saying that unemployed and marginalized people are trash?

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What all theory, no history does to a mfer -

You'll be thinking the "Lumpen" are just expendable, based on Marx's own prejudices instead of the most successful revolutionary class, within your arbitrary definitions.

You know what? Go read some theory from the 21st century. Go read some Graeber.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The theory, regardless how old it is, remains unchanged. The same struggles we face today were the same struggles from 200 years ago

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your theory does not adapt to reality as demonstrated by history, any claim of "scientific" socialism is just Capitalist Marketing.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In socialism everyone that are able are expected to contribute. Those that choose not to contribute when they are able to are excluded. There are no freeloaders.

Those that do not work do not eat.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is why we can't have nice things

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago

We can't have no e things because too many people defend capitalism and its exploitation. Which is wild because none of them have, and never will, any level of capital

[–] the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 week ago

this is fucking dope!