this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11067 readers
770 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Much of the waste was sent to Turkey, followed by Malaysia, with Indonesia also a regular destination. Investigations have repeatedly linked the plastic recycling industry in these countries to environmental damage, illegal dumping and burning, and labour abuses.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

We live in a system where costs are only realized at the manufacture of a product and not at its disposal. The inevitable outcome is cheap production wins, leading to throwaway societies, and ignoring the cost of disposal, which is also an important, even critical cost of associated with the product. Society is left to foot the bill, while the manufacturers prance away without having to cover the costs of the problems they created.

The solution is simple - if a company manufactures and sells a product, then that company should be responsible for its disposal as well. This will encourage longer lasting products and reduced environmental damage as well. Plastics are not as cheap as they seem when you factor in the full lifecycle of the costs associated with them.

It would be difficult to implement in practice, but pales in comparison to the massive damage we're doing to the environment.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah… Recycing mixed plastics was always a scam…

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 28 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

That's what plastic recycling actually looks like. The plastic waste is removed from its place of origin and introduced into the water cycle some place else.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 10 points 22 hours ago

wHy aRe ThE pOoR CoUnTrIeS pOlLutInG sO MuCh??!1!!!!?11

Because we export our fucking plastic there to absolve ourselves of the responsibility. Exporting waste to third-world countries should quite simply be banned and I'm glad at least the EU will do so.

The EU has agreed to ban exports of plastic waste to countries outside the group of mostly rich OECD nations by November 2026, yet half is still being sent to those destinations. Much of the remainder goes to Turkey, now the largest recipients of European plastic waste.

With the ban approaching, there are concerns that all exports could be redirected to developing OECD countries such as Turkey, as well as parts of eastern Europe, which lack the capacity to manage higher volumes.

Then they can finally shut up about "most pollution to seas some from these 3 Asian countries" and walk in their shoes for a while. Even the UK is suffocating under their waste and it's being dumped everywhere. Tough to blame immigrants when you're doing the polluting and it ends up in your own backyard.

But the people will find a way to blame immigrants anyway. Anything to avoid taxing the rich and their wealth.

[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 9 points 23 hours ago

Germany recycles the most plastic in Europe, while also using the most plastic. So I'm not surprised. I personallyprefer shopping in Turkish supermarkets in Germany to avoid plastic packaging (I bring my own).

[–] paw@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Ok, exporting plastic waste is not that good, but: the export champion of the world from yesteryear is so back.

/s

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

that's... not a lot. at 83 million people that's less than 10kg per person per year.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, sent to countries that can't process it and just dump it in the sea. "not a lot"

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

point being, obviously, that most countries send a lot more per capita.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously that doesn't make a difference to the country receiving 810k tonnes of trash.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

that country is most likely receiving multiple orders of magnitude more than that.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"so what's a little bit more?". Yeah, great point.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

i feel like you're not arguing in good faith. my other replies makes it abundantly clear what my point is, but i'll reiterate anyway: germany's plastic export per capita is lower than many other european countries, so singling them out by presenting the number without context is unproductive. in cases like this you want to be going for the low-hanging; if italy exports 15kg of plastic per year, then it's cheaper and faster to get italy down to 9kg rather than inventing new technology to get germany down to 7. repeat for every country. naming and shaming doesn't work when they're in the lead.

sweden missed their paris accord climate goals because of thinking like yours: the accords called for improvement in greenhouse gas emissions from industry every year by a certain number of tons, and we couldn't get there because we were already using the latest tech. poland, meanwhile, started slowing down their transition because the better they did one year the harder the next one would be.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Alright, I'll level with you. What annoyed me was your use of "obviously" and "abundantly clear". Please consider where you are right now and what medium you're using:

  • you might be anywhere in the world with a completely different experience and culture than me
  • you are communicating on a medium where your intention can only be judged by the words you write in the context they are present. no facial expressions, no emojis, no tone of voice, nothing else

So things aren't as "obvious" as you make them out to be.

Now that that is out of the way, you are still downplaying the role Germany plays in plastic pollution. 810 thousand tonnes is far from a negligible amount to export per year. No matter how you spin it, Western countries still consume and waste obscenely more than non-Western countries. They do terribly in carbon consumption too.

I can appreciate the "at least we aren't doing as bad those other guys" ( imagine the brag "hey we gassed only 600k Jews, they gassed 2M, we're so much better!") , but it's still 810 thousand tonnes exported to countries that cannot deal with even their domestic plastic waste. If the headline were "Germany dumped 810 kilo tonnes of plastic waste into the ocean", that would sound no better than the "UK dumped 675 kilo tonnes of plastic waste into the ocean". Of course, if we just say "exported" it seems cute and maybe even economy boosting. "We gave Malaysia a few megatonnes of plastic and they just dumped it into the ocean! Bad Malaysia, bad!"

Being able to export the waste to a country that a) doesn't produce even half as much and b) cannot deal with it, doesn't make up for however much you recycle (or claim to recycle) in your own country. It's a cop out.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)
  1. godwin's law
  2. this is about plastic, not about CO~2~
  3. i'm saying that we should do the work where it's the most beneficial in the short term, e.g. start with the easy stuff. what are you saying?
[–] doenerpate@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not a small amount either, 10 kilos, with most of it probably being single-use plastic containers and bags, so it’s mostly avoidable. I’m really not that big of an environmental guy, but using so much plastic is just wasteful, especially considering the plan is to export it to poorer countries as a permanent solution.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

the question is how it stacks up per capita to other countries. if everyone else in europe exports like 12-13kg per year per capita then obviously germany is not the main problem.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 3 points 21 hours ago

More figures are needed. Who manufactures most. What are most use cases for plastic in each countries origin. (e.g. products that arrive pre packaged in plastic rather than in cardboard or other better options)

Among other things