Only because it might’ve affected Perez’s own children. Self-centered GOP representatives don’t seem to understand that they’re supposed to do what’s best for their constituents, not them.
Politics
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
I was just saying that same thing.
Once again, a Republican does the right thing because it might affect him directly.
Also
Specifically, the proposal—the Medical Freedom bill—would have given parents the option to exempt children from required vaccinations based on their “conscience.” The state already allows for medical- and religious-based exemptions.
So, this bill wouldn't really change anything. Currently, if a parent wants to avoid vaccinating their child, they can just claim that it goes against their religious beliefs, whatever those are. Enforcing religious norms would go against the First Amendment, so your religious beliefs are whatever you say that they are. This law is based on the honor system.
Whaaaaaaa? Are they finally learning something?
They finally realized it's less fun to fuck dead kids
That implies that they have fucked dead kids and liked it less.
Yes, that's the joke.

What? Do they think they can squeeze more money out of the lobby by hardballing?
They probably have family that got measles or something, that's my guess. It only gets to them when they get personally effected.