this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
143 points (98.0% liked)

News

37431 readers
1214 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 63 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This assassination attempt was almost definitely a false flag.

Let’s, for sake of argument, say it wasn’t.

The location has plenty of security, security that successfully stopped the gunman.

In what world would this mean “obviously we need more security.” The security worked, it has enough funding, also the thing that protects the president is the secret service which is part of the department of the treasury, not DHS.

So the secret service did their job and stopped a threat and for some reason that means we should give an unrelated part of the government more money.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 35 points 6 days ago

The National Guard never stopped patrolling the streets of Washington DC. The DC police has been placed under federal control. The president himself has called Washington DC "perhaps the safest" city in the United States.

If there's a "moment of national danger" happening under those circumstances, maybe it's not resources that are the problem. Maybe leadership is the problem.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I've wondered if the Germans who watched the Reichstag burn had any idea of what was coming for them.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe... There have been so many times we've said x event was the Reichstag Fire. And sure, I'm not denying it could be this time, but I don't think we should automatically call it such yet.

I'm willing to admit they've tried to make other events be that catalyst, but thus far, it has largely failed. At least in the sense of the transition to complete autocratic dictatorship they want. They've absolutely made enough progress and damage to be very dangerous in other ways, but they are clearly wanting a full dictatorship.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I absolutely love how little people are caring about this assassination attempt.

Everyone kind of just wants the same thing and I love that solidarity.

If this had happened to any other president in my lifetime it would be a much bigger cataclysmic event. And I love that it's not going to help his polling.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's like the boy who cried wolf. The first time a President is almost killed that's big news. The fourth time, a lot less interesting.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago

We're only up to three so far, but we've got time.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was worried this might happen after Trump was wailing about the Filibuster the other day. If only Dems had more than 48 seats in the last 13 years maybe we could have done something about all this.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Biden hadnt supported aipac's favorite genocide we all wouldnt be in this mess. But the money was just too good for Biden and almost everyone else in congress -- on both sides of the aisle-- to pass up. So here we are.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Biden was way too lenient with Israel, but he very demonstrably kept aid flowing into Gaza and withheld large bomb shipments as Israel closed in on population centers, reportedly yelled at Netanyahu over the phone and was always fighting for a ceasefire which included the terms of hostage release which China vetoed in the UN.

Unfortunately he kept selling all other arms to Israel with emergency powers and his admin vetoed all other ceasefire terms.

Regardless, anybody who truly cares about even a single Palestinian life needs to vote out the GOP by any means necessary.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also Harris was pushing for the official investigation into Israel that's required to legally stop funding them.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Harris was also promoted by a large group of Imams and other muslim community leaders for being the most welcoming and communicative candidate they've ever known.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25194305-muslim-imams-and-leaders-letter-to-the-community-on-the-2024-elections-vfinal/

She would have been a better president than Biden, for sure.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a shame she used the political non-answer for questions about it during her campaign.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TBF anybody considering letting Trump win on the topic of Israel-Gaza is a moron.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Agreed. It would have been nice if people looked at her voting history instead.

[–] who@feddit.org 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Raise your hand if you suspect the shooter incident was more like an orchestrated fundraiser.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Some stuff is floating around showing a spike in searches for the shooters name from Israel before the attack. Could be BS.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MeidasTouch/comments/1sw7dr6/cole_tomas_allens_name_searched_over_100_times_24/

[–] ajikeshi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

ah.. the spikes look kinda suspicious... almost exactly 12h apart... so probably just weird date related stuff, dont forget.. google is an ai first company as well... so the data might be bad

[–] wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 days ago

These are completely unrelated things. Fucking stupid

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can really get anything done if you just arrest one guy near a government function.

Private function which invites public figures.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They were always going to nuke the filibuster during trumps term. I'm shocked it lasted this long. This whole thing is starting to look like a big coordinated plan. Just hard to see what the end game would be.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

No filibuster = SAVE America Act passes

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

A white California man tried to KILL our deeply unpopular pedophile president so we need to get RID of the fillibuster so we can FUND the DHS so that they can DEPORT more BROWN PEOPLE!

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 6 days ago

Ahhh, and like that, the motive becomes clearer.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

For sure, but not to MAGAts and a couple million more idiots with the right to vote...

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How would a bulletproof room at your home protect you whilst you're out for dinner?

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

He would hold every event in his magnificent ~~Hitler bunker~~ ballroom and everyone would need to come to him.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They can do this whenever they would like to with a simple majority vote.

They call this "the nuclear option" today, because Trent Lott (notorious Republican) came up with the term; it works well for suppression of bills and scaring the proles, so bOtH pArTiEs have used the term ever since.

What did they call "the nuclear option" before Trent Lott (R.)? The constitutional option. not the same ring to it...

... and all to avoid the threat of filibuster... let them filibuster. They have five months off a year, they can always catch up. I posit that the vast majority of members who threaten filibuster are far too lazy and old to actually do it. Much of the "old guard" are over 70 years old, something like 120!

Anyways, they use this "nuclear option" to bypass the threat of a filibuster, and do this whenever they really want something to pass; then, it only needs a simple majority vote.

This parliamentary rule confuses the vast majority of people.

Remember, they can always pass a bill with a simple majority vote (that's what makes Biden's failure to raise minimum wage so frustrating), and even if they couldn't, they don't bother to filibuster any longer. Stop playing pretend.

They're doing the absolute minimum amount of politics so that they have more time to trade stocks and attend "seminars" in The Virgin Islands on the taxpayer's dime.

[–] cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Exactly. at the end of the filibuster... THEY VOTE!

The filibuster needs 2/3 to break but it always ends eventually, and then it's a simple majority.

All of congress just use this as a boogeyman for people who have never studied the rules.

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I can't wait to watch the Guardians of Pedophiles party implode the closer we get to November.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

GOP is pathetic