this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
174 points (98.3% liked)

Buy European

10192 readers
340 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Over the past 18 months, Tesla has been working with the Dutch vehicle approval organization, RDW, to get approval for its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) semi-autonomous driving system.

After a long consultation period, which included covering almost one million miles with FSD (Supervised) active and offering ride-along trials with 13,000 people in numerous European countries, the RDW deemed the technology safe to be given the green light.

Teslaโ€™s controversial CEO, Elon Musk, has long-promised to introduce the partially autonomous cruise control system to other markets outside of the US, where it has been on sale for years. But the company has regularly butted up against regulatory red tape.

According to a press statement put out by Tesla to promote its European debut, the company says that when FSD (Supervised) is engaged, collisions are up to "seven-times less likely per kilometer driven compared to manual driving alone".

However, safety campaigners, such as Dan Oโ€™Dowd of The Dawn Project, reiterates that โ€œ59 people have been killed in over 3,000 crashes involving Teslaโ€™s self-driving software in the U.S. since 2021 aloneโ€.

"The RDW's decision is deeply troubling given Tesla FSD's myriad of well-documented safety defects," Oโ€™Dowd adds.

What's more, the companyโ€™s Robotaxis, which use a similar hardware suite that relies on the vehicleโ€™s external cameras and artificial intelligence to navigate the world, as opposed to a plethora of radar and Lidar sensors like rivals, have made the headlines because data suggests they crash four times more often than the average human driver, according to Fortune. Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

In a bid to bolster its safety credentials, Tesla has made a number of changes to its software for the version that will go on sale in the Netherlands.

Not a Tesla App reported that those customers that had first-hand ride-along experience with Euro-spec FSD (Supervised) noticed that it differed to the technology found in the US.

Dutch owners will have to pass a mandatory safety quiz before FSD activates, for example, while the 'Sloth' to 'Mad Max' speed profiles in the US version have been ditched in favor of more straightforward 'Max Speed' setting in the Netherlands.

Analysis: Europe will be watching closely

While it is easy to think that the recent ruling in the Netherlands will automatically open the door for FSD (Supervised) to be used in the rest of Europe, it is highly likely that many other markets will continue to exercise caution.

Even RDW, the organization that gave the green-light to FSD (Supervised|) in the Netherlands, says that the system is not "self-driving," adding that the "driver remains responsible and must always remain in control."

This confusion with messaging used to promote the technologyโ€™s capabilities has caused plenty of problems in the US, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launching an investigation into the safety of the technology.

Recently, it escalated its probe to "Engineering Analysis", which it says will evaluate the systemโ€™s ability to operate in reduced roadway visibility.

All the while, Elon Musk continues to promote the fact that every iteration of the FSD software will โ€œfar exceed human levels of safety" and that users will soon be able to text and drive, when realistically, itโ€™s simply a Level 2 semi-autonomous cruise control system that is also offered by the likes of Ford and BMW.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Aaah! We are going to see so many of them in the tram ditches <3

[โ€“] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Disqusting move from my neighbors

[โ€“] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The one good thing in this is that the car remains the responsibility of the person driving it. That won't keep everybody safe, but at least nobody will get away with saying they got a faulty/imperfect car.

[โ€“] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

No if they say itโ€™s full self driving it should be full self driving and Tesla should stand behind that by taking responsibility of any claims for accidents that occur while FSD is engaged.

"Your Honor, my clients joysticks were drifting. Thats why he crashed into the Winter market"

[โ€“] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's completely and utterly unreasonable to expect full auto drivers to be capable of being responsible. How attention works makes it impossible and is exactly the opposite of the entire value of self driving cars.

[โ€“] axh@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I was baited by the mention of this famous country Europe, but was disappointed because "It is only legal in the Netherlands, but more regions could follow".

Multiple things are legal in the Netherlands, and most European regions did not follow.

[โ€“] Airfried@piefed.social 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And it almost makes sense for the Netherlands. Almost. They have amazing infrastructure. Their world class cycling lanes are pretty much disconnected from roads for the most part and even their highways are very decently lit at night. Then again, allowing Teslas to self drive isn't the kind of mindset that got them there in the first place and I won't be surprised when Teslas still fail under these stellar conditions.

[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Teslas should be banned on headlight output alone

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They have matrix headlights which are allowed in the EU, its probably not a problem there.

[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

matrix headlights still aren't good enough

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Why not? They literally black out the area where another car is?

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 11 hours ago

Europe isn't a country yet - sadly.

[โ€“] halfapage@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Full Self-Driving (not Full)(not Self)(not Driving)

[โ€“] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 12 hours ago
[โ€“] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 12 points 12 hours ago

Considering the Dutch sold weapons to their invaders, before during and after the invasion, it's unsurprising they woukd betray their own people and the rest of the EU for a bunch of money. The real surprising thing here is one would expect the Dutch of all people to know that whatever is being offered is driven by massive overvaluation due to stock market speculation, itself, a dutch invention.

[โ€“] bluGill@fedia.io 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

"reiterates that โ€œ59 people have been killed in over 3,000 crashes involving Teslaโ€™s self-driving software in the U.S. since 2021 aloneโ€

more than 42,000 people were killed on the road in just the US alone, almost all by human drivers!

The real need is not perfection, it is at least as good as humans. Better than humans would be nice. Don't be fooled by statistics, they can be manipulated to say whatever you want, and it isn't just Tesla doing it!

Sadly even though I'm sure data exists I've never seen anyone independent publish anything trust worthy on how self driving compares to humans. All I've seen is data from someone with obvious biases. (they might be right but they still have a bias and so need independent analysis)

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's easy to make numbers look scary yes, and it'd be better if we had more accurate numbers. The only way were going to get that though is better laws mandating their release. Even now, Tesla is allowed to redact information about crashes in their Robotaxis (which this isn't about) which is a problem.

But lets just go by what he used on his site, which today lists 3013 crashes and 59 fatalities since 2021, but keep in mind, the FSD software was very beta until early 2024 when it finally went wide. This guy HATES Tesla, so I'm sure if there were more he'd have updated it accordingly.

Today, just over 9 billion miles have been driven on FSD since 2021.

So, 3013 crashes, over 9 billion miles is 1 crash every 2,987,056 miles, or 1 crash every 4,779,289 km.

NHSTA says 1.06 fatalities happen every 100 million miles, and the year before it was 1.16

So, 9 billion miles / 100 million miles * 1.06 = ~95.4 fatalities, and the year before would be 104.4

So Tesla has had 59, and there would have been 95.4 And while sad that there were fatalities on earlier versions of software, that isn't the software on the road today, so they should hopefully be at a declining rate as well, but we'll need more data to track that.

Before people used to say but Tesla's numbers are all highway so it's not a good comparison against the NHSTA numbers which includes city driving, and you know what, they are right about that, and it is a problem, but Tesla has finally started sharing city miles, and they're up to 3.3 billion now, so these statistics are starting to include them and will start giving a better picture.

And I just want to stress, this is for SUPERVISED driving. Tesla's Robotaxi's are NOT this safe.

Human + Robot > Human OR Robot in our current state.

Edit: oh and it looks like Dan's numbers include Autopilot, not only FSD which this is about, which is far far inferior, but that probably increases the miles driven substantially as Tesla's reporting on FSD numbers is specifically about FSD. They've also stopped offering AP on new cars.

Edit: Updated expected fatalities to 95.4, I accidentally used 1.05 instead of 1.06 when i calculated it.

[โ€“] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It literally says the robotaxies crash four times as much as humans

[โ€“] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago

That is a headline yes. However I have not been able to trace it down to anyone who is independent and has looked at what it really means. There are too many ways to cherry-pick numbers to make a point. I don't want headlines, I want someone who understands traffic safety and how to work with numbers to do an in-depth analysis. This is hard work, and so far it is missing (except as done by the self driving companies and thus biased)

[โ€“] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

(Supervised) should become the new but not really

[โ€“] Airfried@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Even supervised driving should only be legal if the remote driver resides in the same country with a legit drivers license and a taxi license. It's outlandish how "self-driving" cars rely on drivers from a different continent with no proof of proficiency.

[โ€“] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

What I understood is that supervised means that the driver still have to be paying attention to the driving and take control in case of something happens.
That's so they can blame the driver when something goes wrong. It's not the Full Self Driving (supervised)'s fault, it's the supervisor's fault for not supervising correctly.