this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
467 points (97.0% liked)

Political Memes

11629 readers
4495 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (11 children)

I wonder if people outside the US grasp the size and scale of America. You're talking like 300 million people spread across massive geographical, cultural, political, and social scales. There is little that connects most Americans to their neighbors and the Epstein Class that runs things works 24/7 to degrade that and turn neighbor against neighbor. It's a dysfunctional system where people are trapped by runaway capitalism with no escape.

Do not expect progress overnight.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You'd have to be quite the optimist to expect a positive change from the US at this point. The same points you cite works against any form of improvement to the point where it's a borderline impossibility.

You should've taken Russia seriously instead of letting them slowly wear you down until they got exactly what they wanted. Dugin wrote a fucking book outlining exactly what they were planning yet nobody took it seriously. I'd even go as far as to say very few are taking it seriously to this day.

You should've taken care of your healthcare and educational institutions. The state of your school system is so bad I don't even have words for it. It'll take generations to rebuild it while the abomination that is your health insurance is systematically leeching whatever they can from people too uneducated to understand what is happening to them. I'm not judging people here either, this is a well planned system that needs to be thoroughly dismantled for people to have a chance.

You should've worked on the systematic racism that never truly went away. Instead it became the perfect vehicle for discord while simultaneously masking the class warfare that truly fucked everything up. It's also feeding a prison industry that isn't anything but the continuance of slavery.

You definitely should've made sure money wasn't the deciding factor in politics and while you were at it you should've taxed those assholes that are destroying the planet right now. Instead they took over and now they're running things almost exactly like they want to. What little resistance there is to their governance is divided and thrown against each other over and over again.

It's a little late to change things in any sort of civilised way now, and we're all going to suffer for it. The whole planet, not just your population. I feel truly sorry for all the decent people who were born too late to have a say in any of this. I know there's a lot of good people with no good options just trying to survive. Hopefully I'm wrong and you can sort it out.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I think most reasonably educated people around the world are fully aware of all of this.

I mention the Epstein case in one of my comments just because I assume that the vast majority of the population despises pedophiles and wants to see them punished for their monsterous crimes - to me, this seems more like a unifying factor that could be used to bridge political divides. I mean, with Massie, there’s even among today’s conservatives someone who doesn’t bow to pressure from within his own ranks. So it really should be possible to agree with your neighbor that a regime so obviously entangled in these crimes must be overthrown.

But hey, this is just one starting point - there are many more, given all the rampant corruption, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in the U.S. itself.

I’m afraid that U.S. citizens will have to get used to posts like this one, because the actions of the U.S. regime unfortunately affect the entire world, which is why the propaganda narrative of the friendly superpower spreading freedom is increasingly being recognized for the farce it has always been.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They can’t do that! They are the greatest democracy in the world, with means they are utterly powerless! Don’t you understand?

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Well, I thought I’d give it another try, now that the Dow is below 50,000, a barrel of oil costs nearly $100 (will soon be even higher again), and even the "First Lady" is so openly turning against her husband by pointing out again that Epstein didn’t act alone and that no one has been held accountable for the monsterous misdeeds of the "cabal," which the regime is trying to protect by any means necessary because various people from their own ranks as well as many of their most prominent supporters are so obviously involved in these horrible crimes.

I still have some hope left that U.S. citizens might reconsider and extend the general strike planned for May 1 indefinitely - namely, until the regime steps down and perhaps even some of the the long-overdue, far-reaching reforms are initiated that would be necessary to reduce the rampant corruption in the political and legal systems to a somewhat tolerable level - that seems to me to be the only civil way to break the power of the oligarchs who hold the country in a stranglehold.

You see, the most common argument I’ve heard so far as to why this isn’t happening is that U.S. citizens insist they can’t afford to risk their jobs. Perhaps the fact that the country is on the brink of a recession -which would cost many U.S. citizens their jobs anyway - will change that somewhat -or perhaps the fact that the cost of living is so high that their salaries no longer cover their basic needs.

We’ll see...

We won't see shit. They haven't drawn the line yet, after all their country is doing to the world; I don't have any hopes they will draw it at all. People will keep suffering because of them, but that's fine, because "there's nothing they can do".

I only hope we start seeing gas at double digits, because that's the only thing that may change something, which says a lot about the kind of country they are.

[–] Kwiila@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

He killed (minimum) 300,000 USAmericans by dismantling the pandemic response team, and then willfully rejecting all support in restructuring it during a pandemic. Because Obama built it. He was "allegedly" (at the time) implicated in a literal pedophile cabal. Then he was voted in again. Those voting for him have such insane cultural cognitive dissonance they'll tell you "Well I'm hurting, but I'll sacrifice whatever I need to for AMERICA" asking them "America's what? What for America?" Doesn't even make a dent in the cognitive dissonance, it's so willful.

You're thinking about the whole thing from the "myth of the rational consumer" perspective.

In the right wing mindset the leader IS the group IS the persons. They cognitively need those three ideas to align. That's why their rhetoric uses monoliths for people - "The Blacks", "I am Christian", "Us vs THEM". 30% of any given society are RightWing Authoritarian Personalities. Another 30% are likely passive at best. How the balance of power shifts is about how your society structures it's discourse, politics, and community - and the narratives derived therein. Be careful, it can come for you too.

On the plus side, if the USA gets to vote again, it won't literally be him.

Edit: Opposing him isn't about just opposing a leader choice - it's about opposing the people and the whole system that valued putting a bad-guy reality tv host in power because it made them feel powerful when having a black president made them feel weak and not the in-group.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Since we are not allowed to vote in US elections... Why should the rest of the world suffer the consequences of a bad pick?

Actually I'm sort of gratefull. My government is moving away from the US. And no company believes that data stays in Europe because it's stores on eu servers.. that fairy tale has finally been popped.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The only thing that can stop the current administration is Trump's death. I'm not even advocating for anything; it's just a cold hard truth I've known since November 5, 2024. It doesn't matter how the elections go this year, because if it ever becomes a problem for them, congress would be suspended with the support of the oligarchs. He is king, and there is no way to challenge a king except real power.

I'm also not saying that Trump's death would be a quick fix, just a necessary step. The only advantage we have is that Vance is weak by design and would not be able to hold the coalition of oligarchs and fascist foot soldiers together on his own merits. However, if anybody to the left of a white cishet conservative liberal assassinated Trump, then the fascists would rally behind Vance until he enacted revenge and the Democrats would help them.

The only other thing that would create problems for them is if a broad coalition of people from leftists to liberals organized a serious insurgency against the government. They could undermine critical industries and governmental functions, slowing down the state's tyranny in specific, tangible ways. However, the vast majority of liberals are ideologically opposed to non state violence and don't accept that the country is that far gone. If there is insufficient support, the public will cheer on the fascists violently cracking down on the left because "don't ya know, antifa just as bad as the Gestapo putting brown people in camps!" America is truly the home of the chained and land of cowardly 🙄

edit: spelling/grammar

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

don’t accept that the country is that far gone.

Not technically a liberal, but I think the country is that far gone and while I don't have an issue with non-state violence from the left (assuming its actually effective) I don't hold enough patriotism or feel any culpability for the current fascist admin to care to commit any myself. I expended a statistical anomaly of effort as an individual pre-November 5th to prevent Trump's victory. Drove hours to a different state in my junker ass car just to canvass in a swing state.

I'm done. I'm not putting my balls on the table when no one else seemed to have gave much of shit before. Just because the consequences are falling on everyone's stupid asses and now they all seem to care. Fuck em.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I campaign for violence against billionaires and people in the current administration but get raked over the coals. How else do you expect we stop them?

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As I mentioned in my comment above: A general strike that continues until the government resigns seems to me to be the only peaceful solution. I cannot judge whether this is realistic, as I am not a U.S. citizen.

Viewed from the outside, however, it seems to me that this is only remotely realistic if the living conditions of ordinary Americans deteriorate to the point where they rise up. I have no doubt that the living conditions of American citizens will continue to deteriorate. But whether and when this will lead to sustained mass protests or even a sustained general strike, I cannot say.

[–] humblearrogant@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most people can't afford a general strike either. We ourselves are having our liberties surprised. The only ones able to lash out against the oligarchy are those who have already lost everything to the machine, and even then some of them end up too broken to be able to do something meaningful. Luigi is a rare case where action actually resulted in change and it spoke to the majority of the country who is tired of being abused like indentured servants.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

In this case, I am convinced that the U.S. will become a full-blown autocracy like today’s Russia sooner rather than later.

The regime has already laid the groundwork for this, and if it decides to do away with even the pretense of democracy - which I consider more likely with each passing day - resistance will effectively mean that those who have the courage to resist will vanish without a trace.

That’s how it was in my home country back when the Nazis took over Germany. Here, too, people were convinced that things would somehow work out on their own- what actually happened is written in the history books.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The saving grace is the same as the Nazis. They are not working together twords a common goal but using eachother to get to individual goals. The dark enlightenment crowd wants full on collapse. No more Russia or USA they want technofeudalistic city states. Trump wants money and his name on stuff before he dies. Miller wants to be Goebbels. Don Jr wants to fix bets and do lines. JD wants to be president. A bunch of these idiots want the literal rapture.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Change would seem to entail violence no matter how it was went about. We can't strike without losing our jobs, therefore our homes and healthcare, people don't have the financial means to strike indefinitely so they would have to occupy buildings and break other laws to keep it going, the police would be directed to break up occupations and assemblies with force resulting in death and injuries.

We have had mass protests and public occupations from time to time for decades now that have been met with police repression, murders and abductions from the government and reactionaries, and they resulted in little progress as far as reduction of the fascist violence from our government and military. Though the history of this resistance has brought the public's awareness and discontent to a point where a more radical change in the system could be possible.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I love how this blames a group of people for inaction while also itself being another form of inaction.

Embargo the shit out of us, stop buying our gas and oil, pirate our movies and software.

We want them out of power too, but most of us are so vulnerable to job loss, home loss, healthcare loss and food instability that there isn’t much we can do until we are properly organized across 50 states, 100 million people spread across 3.12million square miles (8,081,000 million square km). That’s the scale of the situation.

Also we know national politics aren’t democratic. The senate is intentionally disproportionate representation, but the house isn’t really any better, because the minimum is 1 representatives per state, even when one of the states has 1.5% of the population of another. So Wyoming has 1 rep per 500,000 people, while California has 1 rep per 750,000 people. And in the senate it’s roughly one senator for 250,000 in WY and 1 for 19,000,000 in CA. That means people in densely populated cities (who tend to be higher educated left leaning voters) are way under represented.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

We are too dumb and poor. Bomb us or something.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not going to happen. Have you seen how they've admired and lionised Musk?

If a man that literally saluted Hitler at the US president's inauguration is casually handed billions then something is very wrong with that country.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Ah yes, because everyone in America thinks the same. Just like in the UK, right?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Brb, toppling the government by shooting up the white house. Should be easy

[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

You're right, we should have tried rolling over for the literal Nazis in less than a day like you effete, rich fucks in Western Europe. Pretty easy to say nothing short of a general strike is worth it when you live in the actual first world, have unions, and know that you won't get evicted and start starving after one month. But please, keep the chorus of unhelpful advice coming from the countries that haven't actually struggled against tyranny since they manned barricades with muskets. We'll try surrendering even faster next time in your honor.

Edit: meanwhile some of us are out here actually risking arrest and detention in a concentration camp in the swamp trying to do the right thing.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I live and Western Europe, and ai have to wholeheartedly agree with you. I think a lot of people here are really naive, thinking toppling the US government is something you do on a normal tuesday or sth like that. I really feel with Americans who want change, but can't do much because there are no social safety nets in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sorry all my friends and family are locked up, overdosed, or they got shot.

The US government has never listened to the people. Whoever thinks they do is pretty stupid.

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unhelpfulness of the meme aside, always down for advice on how I can do more. I protest and volunteer when I can, I'm even trying to get involced in politics, but everytime I ask I get more good advice so might as well!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

We would if we could.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The best thing they'll offer you is a, "sorry"

But only aft'r they voted for republicans again during the midterms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Toupee Tariff man is undeniably the worst, aside maybe Putin or Netanyahu.. But there's so many countries with far-right/fascist dictators or plants out there nobody seems to be mentioning right now. Good chunk of Europe too. Removal of him would help, but I don't think its going to fix the overall issue.

[–] Ibisalt@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But there is only one that has nukes and that seems dumb enough to belive, that there could be solved anything by nuking somebody. I mean not even north korea has that pure evil "I dont care about consequences"-vibes.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Russia, china, israel, and much of europe has nukes too....

[–] agingelderly@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Their leader is far younger, far healthier, and far far far better educated than pedo man

[–] PumpUpTheJam@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How many of those can tell a carrier group where to park?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

It’s just that simple!!!

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Not looking to start another Rwanda

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Best we can do is dance around in frog costumes and demand the president get congressional approval before committing mass war crimes

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m down for anything. But this is the best I’ve heard today. So, yeah wtf not?

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is quite literally how portland, and few others, have been handling it

load more comments
view more: next ›