this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
610 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

15522 readers
642 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 20 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The solution to cars being shit isn't old cars. It's bicycles and trains. Lots and lots and lots of trains and bicycles.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I mean this clearly shows how rectangular cars were back then, which is not great for collisions. They should at least stay round.

Also i read a discussion recently about how EVs are heavier due to their battery (and that's supposedly bad for pedestrians when they get into a crash with the car), and i immediately had to think of how enormously overweight SUV vehicles are today, and people don't complain enough about how enormously overweight SUVs are. In fact some people praise it and say that the heavy mass is good for the car-driver of the SUV because when they get into a crash, they'll take less damage (while everyone around them takes more, btw).

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

In the case of SUVs, it's not primarily the oil lobby, it's car manufacturers. Put simply, they get to charge way more than the extra materials costs, for a "premium" vehicle. They're making bank out of this shit.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 41 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I hate the huge SUVs you see all over the roads, I have a 2021 Seat Leon FR PHEV hatchback, and around here the Kia EV9 is really popular.

While not as large as the stupid Ford F-150s, the EV9 is fucking huge.

The bonnet of an EV9 reaches almost up to my Leon's roof:

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/seat-leon-2020-5-door-hatchback-vs-kia-ev9-2023-suv/

It should be illegal to have a car with the headlight at the eye level of a driver of a standard WV Golf type car.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 14 points 4 days ago

Bonnet height for private vehicles should be tightly regulated, they are a key contributer to lethality in car accidents yet increasing every year. I could imagine some steep increase in taxes (at least at purchase if nothing else) the further you deviate from a defined reasonable height. People do care about money, make lethal asocial choices more expensive.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Eric_Pollock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

My contribution - 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon. It is pretty large, but hilariously it's still smaller than a Chevy Tahoe lol.

A 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon painted white with stripes in the colors of the German flag running down the sides

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

And it probably fits more stuff!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feddinat0r@feddit.org 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A thousand times this.

You used to look through the car in front of you to see the traffic in front of that car

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

To be fair, those cars with huge windows and great visibility handled rollover accidents by crushing the heads and necks of everyone in them.

Everyone driving SUVs to get to the office is dumb, but we don't want to go back to the days where the passenger cabin is the primary crumple zone either.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago

I remember being annoyed by a noticeable increase in the diameter of the cabin pillars of new cars that happened in the mid-late 00’s until I found out it’s because before then rollover protection was akin to prayer and new standards were the culprit for the change. Never complained about the reduced visibility since.

A young lady I worked with for a while was in a wreck years ago, before I met her, that resulted in a rollover in an older vehicle. It absolutely flattened the top of the cabin and pinned her inside with a badly shattered femur. From memory she said it was 4 hours before someone found her. Frankly; fuck that. Give me a new car with a bunch of safety considerations, thanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine if speed limits were variable based on a car's weight and lethality. Only small cars are allowed to go fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@piefed.social 31 points 4 days ago (16 children)

station wagon superiority

i need an electric station wagon goshdarnit!!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In a surprising reversal, the meme got it right (SUVs, 90s) and the title did not (SUV's).

Even when dealing with acronyms and numbers, " 's " indicates possession.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Not the 90s, return to most people not owning a car

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Make cars a choice again. Not a necessity!

And watch car ownership rates plummet. Turns out most people would gladly save their car money for something else if they could.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago

My humble contribution

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Yes!

Finally a nuanced take in this community.

Cars wouldn’t be so bad if they weren’t so oversized

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Cars wouldn’t be so bad if they weren’t so oversized

And if there weren't so many of them.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

And if they didn't pollute so much

Edit: oh and the traffic accidents of course! But aside from their size, the required infrastructure, their number, the pollution, and the traffic accidents, cars are totally fine!

Edit 2: And the noise! But other than those things...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Smaller cars will continue to kill a few billion animals yearly. They will also continue to kill around a million of humans every year, or about one human every 30 seconds.

The area covered by parking lots is mostly impervious and contributes to flooding as well as heat islands. Cars and parking lots make cities hotter and are worsening climate change. They also contribute to noise pollution. And no, electric cars are not better for noise because at highway speed they are as noisy as fossil fuel cars, and at low speed, their pedestrian warning system is also louder than fossil fuel cars.

I can be nuanced and understand that some people will always need a car, but most people in the world live in a town, a suburb, or a city, and the existence of the vast majority of those cars cannot be justified, whatever their size. Of course smaller cars are desirable. Electric cars are desirable A mix of electric and smaller would be better than status quo. But fewer cars is even more desirable.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

their pedestrian warning system is also louder than fossil fuel cars.

Hasn't been my experience, not that I disagree with your overall argument. Might differ by country and regulations etc.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It does vary depending on the manufacturer. Some are pretty quiet. I can't hear any Tesla "honking at low volume" when they pass by, but they probably just don't comply with new regulations. I find Hyundai to be the worst.

I live in a tower at the intersection of a busy street with traffic lights and I can hear the Hyundai EVs while sitting in my couch when the windows are open. In fact, they're open right now and I can clearly hear a Chevrolet EV decelerating before coming to a stop at the traffic light while I'm typing this. Toyota EVs are also pretty loud. Granted I can also hear loud and modified fossil fuel engines but most of them usually blend into a white noise.

When walking around the smaller streets of my neighbourhood, cars are going pretty slow and the noises of Hyundai, Chevrolet and Toyota EVs definitely stand out. It's weird because I'm a pedestrian. I don't have a car. I hate them. And I want them to be secure for pedestrians. But some of those warning systems are so loud and annoying that I wish they would just be quiet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

“Fuck cars”, like “ACAB”, is often a quick tagline to a problem people understand is more nuanced. I don’t think so many people here would literally like all cars in existence to be crushed in a heap.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

Literally most though. And I agree.

Public transport is the way to go.

Exceptions for delivery and trucks for construction, emergency services etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I suspect you and I are saying "fuck cars" for very different reasons

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You'll never convince me that SUVs don't exist solely to sell what is effectively a minivan to deeply insecure men.

[–] ViaGetty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

Deeply insecure men buy pickup trucks with hoods I can barely see over. SUVs and their perception of "safety", storage space, and ride height are why women are the primary purchasers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I do like my crumple zones, but would like modern cars to downsize like they did in the malaise era.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it might be small but it got worse gas mileage, was heavier and would kill you in a fender Bender.

[–] paul@lemmy.org 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Turning a corner was like opening a submarine hatch. The brakes locked up causing more accidents and deaths. The suspension allowed the cars to roll easier. And if you were hit by one of them, you had a much higher chance of severe injury or death due to the lack of crumple zone.

People really need to stop looking for solutions to modern problems by looking to the past at the things that were the reason we ended up with the modern problems.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I enjoy my small shitbox (2007 KIA Rio5 hatchback) and wish I had a smaller shitbox to commute in

One of the biggest perks is the fact that my little shitbox is FIXABLE by sane people with standard tools! No special tools, parts are literally everywhere, and all the parts are DIRT CHEAP. The engine is in Hyundais and KIAs from 1989 to 2011. If it's a 1.6L 4 cylinder made by those 2 companies it's the same engine between ALL OF THEM.

EDIT: The biggest difference is the exhaust routing. The midpipe on the Hyundais is straight, the KIAs it's got a bump.

[–] Tottakai@europe.pub 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, that Ford Fiesta model was truly Fix Or Repair Daily.

God, how bad it was. The shittiest and most unreliable car I ever had.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BiglyFlyBye@piefed.zip 11 points 4 days ago
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Meanwhile me back in University:

[–] null@lemmy.org 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is a nice thought, but if that older car hit a wall at the same rapid speed as any of those modern cars, everyone in it dies while the people in the modern car walk.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SupersonicHail@lemy.lol 8 points 4 days ago

It was always an american disease from my perspective. But it slowly infected Europe. Now every goddamn household drives a fucking huge ass minibus/truck/Fucking Hummer sized family wagon to work.

The worst part is when they take up so much parking space that the lots next to them are practically unusable because they fuck you, I needed this bigass milonstertruck for casual commotion.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›