this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
452 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

9815 readers
805 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

This a recent favorite bit about Epstein, that jokes about normalizing knowing Epstein. It's from legendary comedy writer Jim Downey when he was on Conan O'Brien's podcast.

I put it here because it kind of tangentially makes a similar point as the main post. A somewhat normal person has no need to explain that they didn't know Epstein. It's ridiculous on its face. In fact, a normal person would have to go a long way to explain how they hell they knew him.

But it seems like we can assume that everybody rich and famous, and especially rich, went to his island and committed sex crimes.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 1 points 12 minutes ago

Mostly by email

The conspiracy is that all of them know what's good for them solely is also good for the others in their rich person club. They networked, colluded, and talked in college about ways to become wealthier. Just some people facilitated places to meet up is all to further discussion as time went on.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

The manifold abuse's of apostrophe's need's to end 😢

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago

Isn't this just the DAVOS after party?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I shall call it a 'malapostrophe' when people use it to pluralize.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 37 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

yeah but the question is "where do they meet now?"

because lets face it, all the rape, pedophilia, murder, emails, etc didn't suddenly just stop because one guy "killed himself". Someone replaced him.

I want to know who the new guy is and where they all go now.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The crazy part is people that rich were so not worried about their communications that they didn't even bother to encrypt their emails, or host their own communication servers so ensure the data wouldn't get turned over immediately if something went wrong.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

encryption merely gives officers an opportunity to use the wrench attack (https://xkcd.com/538/), but wealth beyond all necessity gives one full immunity against the law in the places where these people live.

There need to be dangers beyond 'law'.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Well they still not worried nothing happening still.

Bohemian grove? Bilderberg? Davos?

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They probably still meet on an island. Epstein's client list still exists. There were more than just Epstein involved in his organization. The trust is managed by someone and people are still in the island

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, we like to glorify individuals, but just about every big endeavor, both good and bad, comes from people working together. An organization like Epstein's Island was big enough that it definitely had more people running it than just the 2 big players we know about. Someone from upper management seized the reins and has things running smoothly again by now, I'm sure. We shouldn't be acting like things have been halted - there's still a lot of work to be done to save the victims of the wealthy.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Thank God for glitterkittyn's contribution to the post, probably would've missed the main point if not for the subtle hint

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The multimillionaires aren't invited to those meets. In 2026, if you are a multimillionaire, you are considered an underclass. That's a ten-digit+ club they're talking about.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Yeah, they're not even close. What's the difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars? About a billion dollars.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I have no doubt there are several big rings around the world. China, Japan, India, SEA, they all have billionaires and all have their own rings, don't you think?

The 40th annual Forbes list of the world's billionaires found a record 3,428 billionaires with a total net worth of $20.1 trillion. This represents an increase of 309 members and $4 trillion compared to 2025.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Time to continue repeating that "he died" part.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Sociopathic narcissist people bubble to the top.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

"Oh darn, we lost our venue, guess we have no other choice but to cease these extremely profitable and gratifying 'meetings,' huh?"

[–] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Also a mansion in California that hosts Baphomet parties/rituals.

And don't forget the golf courses where the majority of deals start.

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

I really wish I understood where this apostrophe s for a plural bullshit started. Sundays. The apostrophe is not needed in the slightest.