this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
167 points (97.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

42089 readers
726 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 month ago

A cancer doesn't plan

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

The owners of other robots.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We kinda have two choices:

Some flavour of socialism where people get what they need for free

Or

Turbo-rio-de-janiro style inequality where we all live in slums

Now the 2nd one is what the ultra rich want and they have a lot of power, so it's kinda on the rest of us to make the first happen instead

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Didn't the French have an option three?

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's an uphill battle, but it's better to start early than late.

The rich have private armies, lobbying groups, and mass surveillance networks to kill dissent. Plus, the pot is slowly boiled.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The rich have always had private armies and spy networks. The technology may have changed, but same old same old.

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

I disagree. My opinion is that the technology did change. It just became more efficient at doing its job (killing people, surveillance, and mass propaganda).

The internet was supposed to be a gateway of information, but now it's the largest propaganda network. Free speech is censored by closed source algorithms and the entire internet infrastructure is controlled and owned by the 1%.

We are more isolated compared to before, class solidarity is almost nonexistent, and its easier to identify people now vs before due to being interconnected real time.

I can go more on and on but the tldr is that technology has made it easier and faster to crush dissent

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Data centres notoriously don't have heads, but I love the enthusiasm

load more comments (3 replies)

The french fucked up cause they didn't have option 1 as the follow-up to option 3.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"maybe the clothes are made of paper. The food is just nutrient paste...."

Or something like that from the Expanse. Sure, your needs are met, but living life on basic assistance seems like a nightmare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Option 3 : WW3 and kill off all the poors

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rauls5@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The economy is already morphing to serve the needs of the upper levels of worth. Look at the trend with airlines shrinking economy sections and expanding first class and business class. Pretty much all consumer offerings are moving to the luxury tier.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Vegas is a good example. Increasingly caters to the top 1%.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a suspicion they are focusing on short-term goals, because that is what those people usually do. For example, it's probably hard to explain who should watch all the ads and buy all the advertised products when Facebook replaces their content and interactions with bot slop. They didn't think this through. This isn't some kind of visionary 4D chess. But it does not matter to them. When wasting 80 billion on a VR project that was doomed to fail from the beginning does not matter, nothing does.

[–] 1D10@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I purposely "watch" ads because I think it's funny that me doing it causes company's to think they work and therefore spend more money, I cannot think of a single thing I bought because of an ad, sure some things I have learned about because of ads but if I bought the product it is because I researched the product and it fit with my expectations, most of the time I buy competitive products because my assessment process asigns negative points for ads that annoy me.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What you’re describing is exactly how most ads work. It’s to inundate you with a brand so you want to search it up and likely purchase it. You never bought directly from an ad, but an ad sure as fuck worked on you.

I’m a former digital marketer. Many ads are meant for brand reach. They’re basically there to ear (mind?) worm you so you’re thinking about the brand. Digital ads can be cheap in niche markets when bidding isn’t forcing up prices due to competition for market share.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, the "elite" aren't actually smart enough to figure that out. Elite is kind of an oxymoron.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

No one asked you to use that word to describe them, why are you perpetuating it?

They're not elite, they're just rich fuckers who attained massive riches by exploiting the workers' need for survival.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That's why they need to horde that much money.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thrawne@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Thats not very “shareholder value” of you. /s

[–] iceberg314@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bender223@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Stuff is people! 😮

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago

Either we all die, or our owners will give us a few bucks to make a living (UBI style), but not enough to do more. We're fucked anyway.

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Thats assuming that complete transition goes unchallenged. I might be misanthropic, but history has shown humans can be fark'n stubborn

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's okay. Elon said we'd all be rich thanks to UBI once the robots have taken over all the jobs. And Elon wouldn't lie.

/s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (19 children)

It's not that hard

Wealth caps. Worldwide. Start at something reasonable, say 10 million

Anything over that goes 100% tot axes. Nobody has a "right" to more than that, nobody needs more than that. No, you don't NEED three Lamborghini's, you don't need 20 houses.

Keep everything else the same, just a single rule to make a huge difference

Governments now will have enough income to fund a huge social net with free education, free healthcare, universal income so that people can spend money to keep the economy running

People now can choose to do some of the little work left.

On a side note: fuck these AI clowns for focussing on AI on exactly those tasks that make life worth living instead of focussing on the mundane shit tasks that nobody wants to do. Garbage collection still requires humans yet these shit stains claim that art andusic is now covered. Yay! Now we have shitty AI art and shitty jobs!

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Rich people mostly. But you can save your camp currency/scrip for a few years and buy some approved shoes or whatever at the work camp store.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They do all the work, so eventually they’ll figure out it’s better to cut the middleman and enjoy the fruits of their labour.

[–] hellequin67@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People should consider reading Iron Heel by Jack London. Written in 1908 it is considered a social sci-fi, reading it now it feels like he came back from the future to write it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

This is pretty much what the empires in the world war era were asking. They found the answer and it was poor, developing countries.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's just gonna be the same 8 companies passing money between each other. Kinda like the Nvidia/openAI circle jerk. Us peasants will live in company towns, and be paid in company dollars that we can spend to buy food and water, from the company. Don't worry, they'll deduct rent straight from our checks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

you will own nothing

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

who cares? that's not this year's problem let alone this quarter. this year, profits go up

It's illegal to look at next year

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Marx figured that out centuries ago. Communism is the only solution to automatisation. Capitalism is an inferior, unstable system.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago

No one, hopefully, we've been buying far too much useless plastic garbage, replacing our electronics and appliances far more often than should be necessary, etc. etc. The whole economy is a sham.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They will push the hard problems they create off to an unfunded government as usual. The only way I can see this working is by nationalizing the AI companies. The billionaires will balk, but millions of people with pitchforks can be a great motivator. The main issue will be if we allow these people to build robot armies, in which case this whole transformation becomes a lot harder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Theoretically if robots make everything, everything is free.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

People and land become "the stuff" and are abused and traded as they wish.

load more comments
view more: next ›