Or we can refuse to listen to anti-"AI" crazies.
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
81 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
83452 readers
4767 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
And eat the dick billionaire shoving at your face willingly? Because that's what AI are, people are forced to used it because their boss demand it.
So maybe you should fight against dick-shoving billionaires, not against useful tools?
If they’re so useful, why are they being forced on everyone, including by making them part of performance reviews?
If they’re useful people will naturally use them.
And people do use them. Naturally.
What about that "forcing" thing you're talking about? Look around. You're being forced with everything by corporations. Why would this new cool technology should be an exception? You're forced to watch sport events, listen to modern music, wear some vogue clothes, kiss your beloved leader's ass, hate those evil Cubans or Ukrainians (depending on who your owner is).
I think is people don’t like it they don’t need to use it. I’m ok with rules stating ai generated content must be labeled though. I wouldn’t even mind a toggle so it could just be turned off.
But it is tech that is here to stay. It is useful to many people.
Useful to who? If you need an LLM to write just a basic e-mail/comment/caption you're maybe ... how do I say this nicely? Not that smart ...
If you use an LLM as a search engine, same thing.
If you use an LLM as a psychologist, same damn thing.
And the majority of people are using it for those things. It's just plain stupidity. I'm not saying there's no use to AI, but right now it's being used in a terrible way by people that have no use for it at all.
It'd be fine if that was the case. Right now if you don't like it you're still forced to read (and often review) AI generated rumblings, communicate with LLMs instead of humans when contacting support, accept AI-specific terms even you won't use the AI part of a product, have data centers pollute your city and pay ridiculous amount of money for a stick of ram.
That would be wonderful if those anti-AI folk would stop using LLMs and switch their attention to something more constructive. But they can't.
Imagine letting an entertainment product write your code for you. Why the fuck are you doing this if you don't even like the act of programming?
No idea why people do that. I suppose some people are too dumb to write code and some other people are too dumb to understand what programmers use LLMs for. What dumb people do best? Attentionwhoring, screaming and throwing hysterical tantrums.
I get writing boilerplate and unit tests can probably be done by software well enough, at least when supervised.
Ill be honest, that's not even my real issue.
My real issue is that programming, devops, systems administration. All of these things are art forms, every bit of them. From high-level application architecture down to the tiniest details of implementation.
Like how much of a library you choose to include, what you name your variables, what type of loops you use to iterate through data. How you choose to format and comment your code.
Giving these choices to the machine is like the painter giving their brush to it.
Just like images generated by stable diffusion will never be worth their fully-human painted equivalent. So too will LLM-developed programs fail to hold that value.
For what its worth, this isnt new. I've held contempt for VC-worshipping developers who see programming as a means to an end far longer than LLMs have been used for serious work.
The thing is people using this stuff are doing harm to the planet and society. So leaving them alone is not going to happen.