this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
91 points (98.9% liked)

Uplifting News

18577 readers
179 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Be wary of science by press releases.

In a mid‑stage study of high‑risk melanoma patients who had undergone surgery, the vaccine combined with Merck's Keytruda reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49% after five years, consistent with the three-year follow-up data in 2023.

So, they had surgery, plus Ketruda.

@$200,000, few will be able to afford this and insurance will not cover it.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Generally, surgery for melanoma is not very hardcore. Since we're talking about the skin, they just cut out the area. It's not a complicated procedure and is the standard treatment for melanoma.

Cancer treatments often gave multiple components to them. Ex: someone gets chemo and then surgery as part of a standard for certain types of cancers at certain stages.

It wouldn't make any sense for someone to get this vaccine and for them to leave the cancer on the patient.

This is huge news, contrary to what you say. Melanoma has a crazy mortality rate. Cutting it in half is a huge success.

Is it affordable yet? Clearly not. But that doesn't mean that it can't get there eventually.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Again, press releases are not the place to get science.

The point of press releases is to boost stock prices, and that didn't happen, which says analysts looking deeper into the data are not convinced.

There is a deep trench of bullshit hype to swim through with pharma data, and the FDA is not the agency to trust any more.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I will give you that. I definitely am on board with that. People love to link pop sci articles with dramatic headlines, but the reality often isn't as dramatic. Pop sci articles definitely are one of my pet peeves. People will be like "cure for cancer found!" when in reality it's just some sort of in vitro testing that destroyed cells. Cancer cells are also killed by bleach and fire, but those aren't helpful for its treatment in humans lol.

So I get it lol. I guess I was just playing devil's advocate for a moment.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Only phase 2 trial, but still hopeful.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

49% reduction, customized to patient’s cancer, and $200k.

Cancer treatment can cost a lot more, so here’s hoping.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This really puts a hole in "they aren't curing cancer because it's not profitable" argument. Insurance companies love cures because it's a lot cheaper for them to pay once than for ongoing treatment, when the only thing you're paying is the premium (and copay or whatever).

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

no one said cure.

Cure is the most abused term in medicine.