this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
198 points (99.0% liked)

Inventing Reality

535 readers
245 users here now

When the media decides who you are rooting for.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 21 points 2 weeks ago

More like hostages

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. All men and women who stood up for themselves, their family, their friends, and their nation. Under every international law they have a right to defend their homes and property.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Imprisonment doesn't mean someone has been charged or convicted of a crime.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

let's not get bog down with semantics, the point is that Israel has mass detained Palestinian citizens and now it's trying to mass execute them all. they are already in the concentration camps and want to upgrade to deaths camps.

they must be stopped.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

The whole point of the reply to that post was to argue semantics.

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree with your points, but Susan(original pic) didn't help at all with her statement. They are prisoners even if illegally so, falsely accused, or locked up for no reason. It would have been much more constructive for her to mention that they have no reason to be imprisoned, rather than make her statement that they're not prisoners.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

It looks to me like she did both. Which is exactly what she should have done.

she was just clarifying they they were innocent. because "prisoner" has negative connotations

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Usually, however, imprisonment is understood to imply actual confinement against one's will in a prison employed for the purpose according to the provisions of the law

Can people stop linking Wikipedia articles which they don't read? As with almost everything in this com, it's not pointing out that the language is factually incorrect, but that it's used selectively in a very biased manner.

Hamas took like 200 people prisoner of which most were actually combatants. But they got accused of taking "hostages".

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But they got accused of taking "hostages".

And holding them prisoner.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Alright now I know you're just here to troll. Bye

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Good riddance

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that the palestinians are considered "prisoners" while the settlers are considered hostages.

"Prisoners" conveys some kind of legitimacy to their detention like probable cause where there is none.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In both cases, hostages are being kept as prisoners.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Very weird how for Hamas they constantly used the term "held hostage" then.

[–] nearhat@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

You mean Palestinian hostages held in Ashkenazi concentration camps, right?

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Disgusting!