Also the us government are not allowed to spy on US citizens but allied governments can and can and will share that information with the US and the US in turn does the same for that allied government. Circumventing the point of the original law.
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
106 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
83072 readers
3059 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I need sources for that one. I really want to be furious about this but I cannot find it. Maybe I need to invest in a better search engine..
Breaking the law, but nobody does anything about it.
just the fact that my data is accessible to anyone is upsetting enough. I take a little comfort in believing my data is like water molecules in the ocean of everyone else's data...
Obviously so that the private prison industry keeps earning.
Correct. YOUR* goverment is buying it.
* only affects less than 5% of world population
I think you're trying to insinuate that the US government is the only one that's buying data from data brokers to spy on its own citizens. I hope we can both agree that that's bad and we don't like that idea, but I don't know what makes you think this isn't also happening elsewhere. Do you have reason to believe it's not?
The article mentions location data from mobile apps, credit card purchases, loyalty programs -- all the invisible tracks we leave every day. What scares me isn't just government access. It's the normalization of surveillance capitalism first. Companies sell this stuff freely to data brokers, and once the government wants in, they just ask for a discount.
This isn't about terrorism or national security in the headlines. It's about who owns your movements and choices. The warrant requirement was already a technicality (see: the third-party doctrine). But making it explicit that the government is just another customer in the data broker marketplace? That's the real story.