Who is "Nikolai" Khrushchev? Maybe ChemicalMind is from a better timeline than ours.
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
48 points (98.0% liked)
GenZedong
5269 readers
74 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
For real, if I was going to glaze a guy to this extent I should probably at least know his first name.
Oh come on it was just a simple Freudian slip, who he really wanted to glaze was Nikolai, the Second.
From what I can tell, the claim about Beria being a rapist and child abuser comes from one historiaster who never even accessed the Soviet archives… not exactly an airtight source.
And Scumbag Montefiore was also in the Epstein circle, so anticommunist propaganda yet again proven as projection lol.
Turns out his mind really is on chemicals
I've seen Chem's posts every once and a while, and ove held the opinion at this point that he's a coin toss between a genuine principled opinion or the most terminally online hot take you've ever seen.
Like his Iran posts drip with that annoying as fuck Western atheist drivel can't admit that the IRI unquestionably had the more correct political line during the revolution while the Communist MEK stabbed the masses in the back by working with Sadaam.
I'm sick of western leftists trying to do the whole "although I don't like the regime" bullshit.
I've always had an occams razor opinion to that sort of thing. [I know that's not how Occams Razor works I just don't have a better example]
If
I hate the Iranian regime
But I support it against US imperialism
And
I support Iran against US imperialism
Are effectively the same opinion, then opinion 2 is better because it "trims the fat" so to speak. Better yet, usually the first one spends 75% of the post complaining about Iran and such before saying "US imperialism bad." Ergo the 2nd statement is also better because it focuses on the right point. Im hoping this makes sense typed out as such
So executing proven child rapists is now a rare and impressive feat?
Well the "proof" was cornboys vibes(also known "as making shit up") and many people not liking Beria(for example Molotov). Being liked was not part of the job Beria had(basically the most confidential shit in the Union), and he was good at it. His distance to Molotov can easily explained by the fact that Molotov was a tad too open with his wife, often sharing confidential information - which Mrs Molotov then loved to share with her friends(according to Stalin).