I wonder how Motorola feels about that, given it's a US-based company. They would have had US consumers in mind when they agreed to work with GrapheneOS, but this seems to suggest Graphene will refuse to support a pretty large potential market in California.
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
120 points (100.0% liked)
Android
33653 readers
798 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My assumption is the model Graphene is supported on will be sold in California, but with Moto Android by default. The user can then install Graphene on their own.
Yes, that sounds likely.
Noice! 😎
The whole idea of ID/age verification on OS level is complete bullshit anyway
Just another (big) step to mass surveillance
A Republicans wet dream