this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
32 points (84.8% liked)

Privacy

4245 readers
372 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Comunasys@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Some months ago I saw a table comparing features and privacy of various messengers, but I don't remember where it was and I couldn't find it again... did anyone else see it and can indicate where to find it?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Just my Whatsapp abstinence alone is costing me dearly socially. Without Telegram it would be straight to the hermitage. Very few normies use even Signal, let alone all the weird and wonderful "even more private" alternatives whose names I never bother to try to remember.

This advice is completely disconnected from the reality of anyone who has, or wants to have, a social life.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Whatsapp > Telegram tho, Telegram isn't encrypted by default which means someone can read your messages on the servers. This not being made clear and having to open a "secret chat" to make the user gullable is a big nono for me.

Also big tech wants you to think you are alone without them and you NEED them, i use Signal only these days, most of my friends have it.

They all have shitton of apps for every shit company which is ridiculous on its own, so what damage does one more app do them (is what i ask..)

The few ones still refusing i just call if i need smth.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Whatsapp > Telegram tho, Telegram isn’t encrypted by default

This argument I have never found convincing. For all its faults Telegram is open source. Nothing made by Meta is. When they say "it's encypted and we promise there's no backdoor", we are taking their word for it. I am not a cynical person but I can think of a thousand companies more trustworthy than Meta.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I look at it a bit differently. If I'm not important enough to my friends and family for them to install a easy to set up app, then I guess I never was that important to them.

I left facebook in 2011, lost contact with most of my school friends, army buddies etc. I left Whatsapp around 2016, lost contact with most of what was left. In my signal there's 6 chats open. Two of them are my sisters, whom I rarely talk to. One of them is my weed dealer. The rest are friends, I guess, but even those chats haven't been active since January 6th (I just checked) lol.

But I know I'm a bit different, I'm a bitter, miserable and grumpy man who doesn't mind being alone. I know most of the people are not like that and would go mad without contact with other people. For me its more healthy to be away from these parasite apps and services than it is to keep up with everyone.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Uncanny. All of that is really close to my experience (I like to think I'm not bitter and miserable but I suspect you're not either - just introverted or on the spectrum).

If I’m not important enough to my friends and family for them to install a easy to set up app, then I guess I never was that important to them.

This is the standard argument and it's powerful. Problem is, it can easily be turned around: "if I'm not important enough for them to install this completely ubiquitous app that everybody is already using, then obviously they don't care much about me". Conundrum! The only way to "win" here is by playing the ethics card. But alas that argument is just not well understood by most people.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I like to think I’m not bitter and miserable but I suspect you’re not either - just introverted or on the spectrum

Perhaps I'm not bitter. I don't know what I am. Tired, frustrated to the point of being done with everything and everyone. I'm not sure what to call it, depression is a major part of it. Introverted, for sure. I'm a introvert even in Finnish standards lol.

The only way to “win” here is by playing the ethics card. But alas that argument is just not well understood by most people.

That's how I decided to drop Whatsapp. i explained to the people I felt I owed a explanation, that I'm not comfortable with the privacy issues and being a play button for big American corporations. They understood it, didn't care. Meh. Fuck them, I guess lol.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I’m a introvert even in Finnish standards lol.

"How can you tell if a Finn is an extrovert? While talking to you, he looks at your shoes and not his own." Boom! You've probably heard it already.

depression

I'd be depressed if I had to endure the darkness of a Finnish winter.

They understood it, didn’t care. Meh. Fuck them, I guess lol.

TBH in principle I'm ready to give up on the Whatsapp boycott, it's just so costly socially. I've lost out on a ton of connections at this point. Maybe nothing would have come of them but it's such a high price to pay for a principle. And after all I use Telegram so I'm hardly pure.

BUT there's a deal-breaker: WA demands physical access to a SIM, i.e. you can't sign up with another number or even continue to use it without the ongoing SIM permission. This is just so outrageous (no other apps do it), and anyway I often change SIMs because of travel. The only workaround is to sign up for a business account (yes seriously) with a landline number, but if you try any funny business (like using a virtual landline number) you will get banned - and indeed I got banned! What a nightmare this damn app is. And also the dumbest name ever.

[–] mech@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I got my family, wife and almost all friends to install Signal. Yes, I'm not in a hundred group chats anymore and sometimes miss stuff but my quality of life didn't get worse from my phone not constantly dinging anymore.

[–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or you know, people can start to move? Always this ridiculous expectation, "i only move if everyone uses it". Like how is thay supposed to work?

No, not everyone needs to make a cold cut, even though it would be better. But you can start using e.g. Signal and maybe one or two of your friends would too. And slowly more and more people would migrate. It's a process, but if most people don't even bother then of course it won't go anywhere.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

where i live even businesses and the government uses whatsapp for their services. it's inescapable.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

As I already mentioned, I already do not use Whatsapp. That is a massive sacrifice where I am. You may not be aware of this (I'm guessing American), but in western Europe almost everybody is now using Whatsapp for pretty much everything. Businesses are replacing the phone and email with it. The situation is even worse in Latin America.

If you meet a new social contact and you don't have Whatsapp, that's likely it, you will not be keeping in contact with that person. Typically they have Telegram installed but hardly use it (so the app gets killed and they won't be notified of your message). As for Signal and the rest, most people haven't even heard of them. I speak from experience. It's a disaster and I worry the people who population this forum (i.e. Americans who still use SMS) are not familiar with how dire the situation now is elsewhere in the world.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

As an Australian I had no idea how ubiquitous WhatsApp had become elsewhere before travelling. I downloaded it for the first time on a trip to Europe because I literally couldn’t contact certain providers otherwise and the only other time I’ve ever used it was when I was in India and was faced with the same dilemma. It was a real culture shock.

I, and everyone I’m linked in with here in Australia, only use WhatsApp to communicate with relatives overseas or don’t use it at all. We all just tend to use SMS or regular phone calls here.

[–] ximtor@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

I have a) ignored the fact you said about whatsapp because i was annoyed with the "inevitable" sentiment. sorry for that and fantastic step from you; And b) i have not used it in..i don't even know, 6-8 years? I was very hopefull more people make a switch during the last time news came up. But i am also in europe and well aware how stupid the situation is, unfortunately.

I am also aware how stupid many businesses are, but i am closer to the other end of the spectrum and just stubborn so i simply don't partake. And i will be complaining, but obviously without much reach in my echo chamber of people who switched anyway.

But what i mean is really that there can be change, slowly and gradually but it works. I my of my close family and most of my few friends to Signal and slowly i see this spreading to aquaintances. Like my bouldering group switched lately, which was a very nice surprise to me.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

WhatsApp bad. Telegram bad. Paranoia good.

[–] aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Reminded me of a basque song "El ojo te ve" from La Polla Records. "You'll be paranoid If you want privacy". Sad to see truth today in words spoken in 1994

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Seems a good summary even if I didn't watch the vid. We've heard these talking points a million times by now.

But I'd say the problem is not that so much that it's paranoid as that it's unrealistic. A messenger is not a weather app. You can't just "change" it, you first need to ask everybody else in the world to change theirs too. Which obviously isn't gonna happen.

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like that's common knowledge, no? 

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe in a privacy community, but not universally.

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Were quite literally in "c/privacy"

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

And not everyone viewing these posts is a member of the community. For instance, I saw it browsing All.

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago

not to nonparanoid folks.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

For secure messaging that isn't centralized and doesn't require a phone number, I'd suggest Delta Chat.

[–] xep@discuss.online -1 points 12 hours ago

SimpleX Chat is good too.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whatsapp is too complicated for Americans

They use even less secure messaging apps

TwoWayPenguin.gif

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago

WhatsApp is owned by Meta. Fuck that shit.