this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55539 readers
3975 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago

Turbocapitalism is empowering the worst among us to be their worst selves.

This dude's work is more important than anything those sociopathic gamblers have ever touched in their lives.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I appreciate putting the threatening quote right in the post. The first time I saw this posted it just mentioned death threats and then I read the article. I’d gotten halfway through it and the bad guys were still just asking, insistently but politely, to have the article changed.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Gamblers falling for the gamblers fallacy?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

Their objective was to make him act before the bet expired. Once they've lost, they gain nothing from killing him. They still might, but more likely it was an empty threat.

[–] jefferyjefferson@lemmy.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I recently invested a lot into gambling stocks because people are going to become more desperate and dependent on it in the years to come.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Metagambling

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The house always wins. He's just taking a stake in the house