this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
3 points (80.0% liked)

Firefox

22692 readers
15 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to save SSD write cycles and will use intel HDD

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bought my first SSD in 2009. It was my system drive for around 10 years.

When I retired it as my system drive, it still had 90% remaining of its service life.

You don't need to worry about saving write cycles.

[–] hyacin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

SATA SSDs last a long time, yes.

I'd imagine OP is actually talking about NVMe though, which does NOT - or at least not on the scale of old SSDs.

I have put more than a couple NVMes in the ewaste bin over the last few years.

We buy and use them for the performance though - and I for one want the web to feel snappy, so while it could be read/write heavy, no way I'd be moving the cache off my fastest disk.

[–] eksb@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Linux-specific: as of version 147, Firefox respects the XDG base dir specifications, so you should be able to set $XDG_CACHE_HOME.

For stuff like cache (tiny small files frequently read and written to) that’s the ideal thing to store on an SSD over an HDD.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tdTrX@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

nice idea,

on a related topic, creating symlink is tedious, is there a way to "move to d disk as symlink folder" to make it easier

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Not sure whats easier than ln -s …