this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
152 points (98.7% liked)

World News

54784 readers
2735 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Emmanuel Macron said on Tuesday France would never take part in operations to unblock the Strait of Hormuz, pushing back on comments by Donald Trump that Paris was ‌willing to help.

"We are not party to the conflict and therefore France will never take part in operations to open or liberate the Strait of Hormuz in the current context," Macron said at the start of a cabinet meeting to discuss the conflicts in the Middle East.

France has been pushing ⁠on with its own efforts to put together a coalition to secure the Strait of Hormuz once the security situation stabilises and without a U.S. role, French officials have said.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago

Oh boy guess we gotta start eating freedom fries again.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

...but allows the US to use French bases for their illegal war, allowed Bibi to fly through the French airspace 3 times after the ICC issued an arrest warrant

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Why don't France want to go to war with a random country for lols? Are they COWARDS?!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

High school logic, used by some world leaders.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Iran has historically been a friendly trade partner with France.

By contrast, its straight up open season on any country in North Africa. Macron practically lead the charge when it came time to carpet bomb Libya. And he was all on board in the overthrow of the Syrian government.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 14 points 12 hours ago

We don't like being part of USA's Finding Out phase. It's a journey they have to do alone.

[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 21 points 15 hours ago

At this point in time, that's the wise thing to do.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Given how unpopular Macron is, this is a bit surprising. I thought he might go for it to distract from his domestic problems.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

yeah it wouldn't work here, and why would he need to make distraction, he can't run for the next election anyway so.

And I'm quite scared by what's coming next, because currently I know what we have and his foreign policy isn't the worse imho

[–] Swemg@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't work well in France I think

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

yeah. someone like pedonald would face immediate general strike. then guillotine before the week end

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's state policy to keep strategic independence. That is why they have independent nukes and why they were adamant about not going to Iraq, but they did sent troops to Afghanistan, because 911 was an actual attack on NATO soil.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Where the "never" came from? The text of the news says "in the current context"?

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It also says "never", but yeah, it's a pretty bland statement when you put the context back in (literally and figuratively).

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 15 hours ago

Re reading again it's actually says never. My bad. The "in the current context" weighted way more in my head.