this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
231 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

45491 readers
727 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

That's some rice field level bullshit

[–] x3lz@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Fuck payment processors use crypto

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Considering every crypto exchange nowadays has KYC, it's not that much better.

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Retoswap, LocalMonero, and Bisq dont

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

you can just not use them, there's still plenty of individuals willing to trade crypto for cash on decentralized marketplaces. You don't have to use the big exchanges just because they are big you know?

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

Actually, there's still stuff like localmonero and bisq which were non-KYC when I last checked, but your point still stands.

[–] Goldenring@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago

Crypto is scam.

[–] DillDough@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Lmao crypto failed at it's purpose before you even knew about it. Shit is centralized and monitored, it's the exact same as any other currency.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Man, the payment processors got bored with NSFW and they're attacking free software now?

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Porn is always the canary in the coal mine when it comes to things like this and censorship.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

My suspicion is that they either were pressed by government to demand that data, or they wanted to terminate contracts at fault of the client.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

They attack everybody that isn't a bootlicker

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How much you want to bet some billionaire bought them on the down low? Because they've been working fine with this FSFE for 15 years and now all of a sudden this is something that they require? It's very suspicious.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Over the past few months, our former payment provider Nexi S.p.A. (“Nexi”) requested access to private data, which we understood to be specifically the usernames and passwords of our supporters. We have refused this request. All our attempts to clarify Nexi’s request, or to understand how their need for such information was necessary and legal, were met with what we consider to be vague and unsatisfactory explanations relating to a general need for risk analysis.

Y tho. What in fuck does a payment provider have to do with asking for this?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

How come there's never a name attached to these things.

[–] listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

As in a name reporting the issue, or a name from the payment provider?

It's on the FSFE homepage if you need confirmation of the story: https://fsfe.org/news/2026/news-20260316-01.en.html

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I mean the name of the people who are originating these ideas. We should be putting names like who are the executives.

They get away with this stuff because they're faceless organizations or higher ups beyond consequences.

I just see so many systems in place that are there to allow these things to trample us and nobody in this generation challenges. Like the opposition to authority in this generation just seems like they're apart of the authority. They're also playing they're role.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this not against GDPR? I feel like this would be a slam dunk case.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago

FSFE should report them to the GDPR authority, but also financial ones.

The article says Nexi reached out after 'cancelling' the contract - meaning FSFE was financially offline for those few days. If it were a 'normal' business this was done to, they would sue for damages to hell and back.

And so should FSFE.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

…and passwords

Um, excuse me? For starters they should only ever have hashes, but there is never a valid reason to ask for that many passwords.

[–] diablomnky666@lemmy.wtf 2 points 15 hours ago

Missed opportunity for them to troll Nexi and just send them:

Usernames Passwords hunter2 hunter2

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Many? Not for one

[–] Nickelalloy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now I am a monthly donor!

Thanks for sharing.

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you, not sure why OP didn't cross-post the original post here?

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Because Jerboa doesnt support that and not even the Lemmy WebUI had an obvious way to do this

[–] exu@feditown.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the future; Lemmy has a perfectly functional cross-post button.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Send a screenshot please. I never managed to do that

[–] exu@feditown.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's how it looks in the Lemmy web ui

From this post

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

at which shareholder's demand?