this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
26 points (96.4% liked)

news

773 readers
741 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“We have a lot of oil,” said Trump. “We were the number one producer anywhere in the world times two by double, at least double. Now I think it’s much higher than that. But we do it. It’s almost like we do it for habit, but we also do it for some very good allies that we have in the Middle East.”

What the fuck does that even mean?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What he’s trying to convey is that non-US countries (like in Europe) are mostly the ones who consume fossil fuels from the Middle East. The US makes more than it consumes.

In Trump fashion, he's oversimplifying a lot (including what type of fuels are produced and where), but that sentiment isn’t wrong. Yes, Europe buys oil that goes through the strait.

So what he’s arguing to NATO countries is “come save your own oil. You need it more than we do.” In spite of the clickbait headline and Tweets, he's trying to sell the conflict to them.


That, of course, ignores a lot. Like:

  • …The US started the conflict.

  • Is it even winnable? See: Iraq. A far smaller country and military, in less difficult terrain.

  • The oil trade is a mix of a free-ish market and independent cartels. Cutting off “EU oil” will raise US gas pump prices because US producers will just sell to Europe, to the extent infrastructure allows. So I don’t think it would disproportionately hurt Europe in particular.

  • My impression is the EU kinda wants to get away from petro, anyway.

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US so accustomed to invading for oil, it can't stop itself, even when already floating in oil.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

The earth is a soup dumpling being transformed into an American public school slice of cheese pizza. Hope that clears things up.

[–] dude@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

He means that US produces so much oil that even if Iran causes disruption, US will happily sell the oil to the Middle East as well

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Treasonous traitors gonna treason. smh.