this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
54 points (93.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

41092 readers
905 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Imagine if companies really had to compete to offer the best products like capitalist apologists preach?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 42 minutes ago

The works of malicious compliance that came from this would be epic.

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

"We want to help you make smart purchasing choices with your money! Now here are all the alternate companies that we own, have a stake in or have a trade agreement with!"

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago

If your company exceeds >35% market share of an industry, the state should be given an option to take control of that company at a set price.

[–] Paragone@piefed.social 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You can't have that percentage be higher than 20%, & have it work right.

50% & you've already reduced that market-segment to a 2-horse race or monopoly.

You have to prevent that, XOR you're creating a national-dependency on "too big to fail" corporation, which is certain, sooner or later, to become a national footgun.

_ /\ _

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Agree that a maximum of 20-25% market share (so a 4 or 5 horse race) makes it a more fair fight, admittedly on nothing but vibes and experience. And markets without the competition require any majority holder to help competitors gain a foothold and create the competition. This would minimise desire to create monopolies as they would be forced into breaking them.

I know in practice this would never happen but I'm talking hypotheticals here.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism excels at breeding innovation. Not in like, useful technology or anything, but in constructing labyrinthine bureaucratic structures to bypass regulations.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Isn't that the truth?

We could do it the ethical way, but let's spend twice as much effort trying to cheat.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think forcing interoperability between similar services would help with this. No more company-specific printer ink. No more "exclusive" chat services.

If a service is bad you can just change it without having to change who still use it/what uses it

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 hours ago

Imagine Spez's reaction if he was forced to federate.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Nice idea, but the monopoly laws already tried to address this phenomenon and companies just restructured to avoid them.

In your scenario, a company just has to split their market in half, rename the product for half their customers, and they're no longer holding 50% of the market.

[–] wiccan2@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

A good example of this is Japanease luxury car brands. They only exist so manufacturers could get around limits imposed by the US on number of imports. Two companies owned by one at the top doubled the amount they could import.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 1 points 3 hours ago

So base it on the parent corporation, and added bonus, no linking to your own companies as 'competitors'.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Once you hit 50% of market share, all owners get a thank you card and pizza party. It's then nationalized.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago

What economic system is OP an apologist for?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Na, they must open source all the platforms they use. Not own, use. Outsourced your hr to Workday? Well now workday have to open source or you need to cancel your contract.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Companies already have to do this when they break the law. They write a stupid hidden page where the text is 3 pixels high. Doesn't work.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

nah, I'm talking about a fixed banner on top 0 on every page taking to a competitors list they do not control :)

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How about any firm that hits a 15% share of any significant market gets declared the winner and is abolished.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why would it be abolished?

You'd have to change services commonly

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It should not happen often. If it does, something's wrong with your system of regulation.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

How would abolishing work? Just delete the company and fuck the clients?

I, too, hate monopolies and centralization, but that just seems inconvenient

Like, Valve's steam has reached past 15%, would everyone lose access to the games?