General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
Yes.
Not just in this area but in most other areas too. Extract ourselves from US dependencies and be more strategically independent. Food, energy, IT (a big one), defence (another big one).
The problem is this won't be easy. You think Brexit was a nightmare. Separation from the US is going to be way harder.
You forgot finance, visa and MasterCard should not exist outside of the US.
Fair one. That too.
I would prefer we integrate more closely with Europe. Depend on a more dependable neighbour.
I guess the UK should build up independent capabilities first, before pulling away from the US. Also maybe the UK should seek greater ties with the EU, which together can become independent from the US. The costs of strategic independence could then be shared across the EU.
Yes, I fully agree, and Canada needs a nuclear deterrent as well.
Do I believe we should funnel billions of pounds of our money into the pockets of arms manufacturers, just so we can have independent control of a weapon whose entire point is to never be fired?
Sure, why not? But can we please sort out some of the more important shit first?
Fair points. But defence might be a sensible thing to spend money on, in a world where stronger powers (Russia, US, Israel) are deciding to attack weaker powers (Ukraine, Iran, Palestine) just because they feel like it
Sure. But is billions on something we already have (but need the USA to help maintain) really the best use of defence spending? Because I bet there are a hundred other areas in defence where disentangling ourselves from the USA would be wise.
Maybe the UK can partner with other European countries to build missiles for nukes, and in return those countries could get protection under the nuclear umbrella. Although I guess that would be a big commitment, promising to launch a nuclear attack on behalf of another country in certain circumstances
Yes, because they are being used to defend against the person supplying your weapons.
Being able to secure your own sovereignty is pretty top of the list of your concerns.
Weapons dont need to be fired in order to be effective, nor a good use of money.
In fact, effective weapons you don't ever fire, is a way better use of money than one's you need to use.
100% right!
Lib Dems agree with the Greens then.
The UK is a failed state and cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.
The guy with the 2nd key for launching the nukes will inevitably be down at the pub anyway.