this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

ThinkPad

1826 readers
6 users here now

IBM and Lenovo ThinkPad laptop enthusiasts!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here I am considering to purchase a newer used Thinkpad than my latest (X1 Carbon G7) and suddenly they release the most repairable laptop of the decade?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

Looking forward to buying one in 3 years or so when corporations start rotating them out.

[–] aaa@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

10/10 should be reserved for laptops where all parts are replaceable. including CPUs.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I agree. So a laptop these days should never hit 10, not even the framework laptops. Seeing the guides i'd give this an 8.5 at the highest. Its very repairable, looks very good, but the screen assembly is missing? I need to find an actual review of it from ifixit

[–] TechnoCat@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Even Framework requires a whole new mainboard to replace the CPU.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It would be impossible to get that score because no processor manufacture makes them.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

Then so be it. Let 9/10 be the highest possible score until some processor manufacturer gets their shit together.

[–] aaa@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they used to, though. having a slim laptop is good, but having a repairable and upgradeable laptop is better, they should at least give the consumers the choice.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don’t do it just for slimness. They do it for signal integrity too. It’s the same reason you can’t get the much faster and lower power LPDDR ram in sodimms. Desktops don’t care about low power so they can blast the voltage. But laptops do, especially at idle.

Would you take a CPU that’s say 25% slower and uses 25% more power just to have it be socketed?

[–] aaa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

A socketed CPU would not realistically be 25% slower or 25% less efficient. your numbers are overly exaggerated. but to answer your question, I would sacrifice a little bit of performance and power efficiency for upgradeability and repairability.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

I wish they brought something like the LPCAMM connector to CPUs. Money aside, I don't see why it wouldn't work.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Between this and GrapheneOS+Motorola thing, is Lenovo becoming less shit again? Awesome!

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently the most recent Mac also has good or at least improved repairability marks. What's behind this? I wasn't under the impression Framework was doing the kind of numbers that would have the big players concerned.

I wasn’t under the impression Framework was doing the kind of numbers that would have the big players concerned.

They aren't. I think it's largely the EU's repairability mandates. That or general consumer pressure.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally I will never buy anything made by Lenovo in my life after an ex-girlfriend bought a flex laptop and I had to spend 2-3 hours taking preloaded bloatware bullshit off of it just to get it to be marginally functional

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

2-3 hours

Really? Why didn't you just reinstall the OS?