while you very well could be correct, there is probably another angle where the intent is to prevent someone from slapping on a bunch of salvaged panels to hide underlying structural flaws in order to keep an unsafe vehicle off the streets. since we are given very few good alternatives to cars in much of the state, I'd rather know I can trust the machine driving next to me even if I can't trust the operator.
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)
Pennsylvania
699 readers
2 users here now
Welcome to the Pennsylvania Lemmy.World community!
Rules:
- This is a community to discuss all things related to Pennsylvania. Posts should be relevant to the commonwealth in some way.
- Keep things civil. Fighting about Wawa and Sheetz is fine. Spewing insults at other users is not. Trolling is not allowed.
- Don't downvote based on disagreement. Downvotes should be used when people are not contributing to the discussion.
- Follow site-wide rules
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Is that not the point of state inspections? That first rule is not going to prove ANYTHING about the safety of the vehicle, and the second one is just over-the-top in requiring it to effectively be like new. As a percentage of causes behind accidents, I would be surprised if not being up to design specs were a frequent enough cause to justify this - particularly in comparison to other more common causes like poor driving. Never mind that the timing of the questionable need for this economic hit is absurdly bad.