this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Meta

4161 readers
27 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is that different for Lemmy? If so, why is PieFed's approach to private communities different from Lemmy's?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

At a guess, private piefed communities don't federate because once content federates, you can't control who can see it. All you can do is hope that the remote instance will follow the privacy settings, but you can't enforce them.

Private lemmy communities don't federate because they don't exist.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because once it leaves the server there is no guarantee that the remote server understands or even respects the notion that it should be private.

Lemmy doesn't have private communities yet afaik.

[–] julian@activitypub.space 1 points 1 day ago

@povoq@slrpnk.net okay, yes. This is true, once it leaves the local server there are no guarantees.

However I'd have to ask whether there is an acceptable tradeoff in risk of content exposure.

After all, even in local private groups, things could get leaked via copy-paste, screenshots, etc. The weakest link is the social element.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real answer: private communities were released LAST MONTH and so far only for PieFed.

Federating would mean a new protocol for potentially both Lemmy and PieFed to agree on. Rules need to be agreed on over how data is handled. New UI/UX. Mod tools to allow communities to block instances that may leak private information. Encryption? Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

Give it time.

[–] anotherpos@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, didn't know that. Okie