this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
189 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

8140 readers
225 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Go back even farther and you'll get to a point where entire games were written in assembly and assets might been written with a hex editor (and even that description might be higher level than what they actually did).

My dad had a computer class in high school that involved filling in ordered punch cards and then they'd send them off to a university to run them on their mainframe and they'd send the output punch cards back. That wouldn't have even been assembly, it would have been machine code, though they probably marked the punch cards to be easier to remember what bits meant what. But it would take like a week to find out there was a mistake in the code.

Sounds crazy from where we are today, but that's all they had at the time. If you wanted to do something awesome, you could either give up, invent a better way, or just buckle down and do it the hard way.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

yup. found a bunch of coke can pallets full of punch cards when clearing out a relative's house in the 80s. They were fortran code for the company he worked at, for the payroll and pension systems.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rollercoaster tycoon is a good example, IIRC

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Afaik before the nineties most games were made in assembly, especially for consoles before PS1. The requirements were just too tight to do otherwise.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

My dad had a computer class in high school that involved filling in ordered punch cards and then they’d send them off to a university to run them on their mainframe and they’d send the output punch cards back. That wouldn’t have even been assembly, it would have been machine code, though they probably marked the punch cards to be easier to remember what bits meant what. But it would take like a week to find out there was a mistake in the code.

wow, sounds slightly faster than the servers I have to write selenium automation for.

good news, they asked me to get off the project.

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

God, the RE1 remake is amazing

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

I just played through the original, still holds up actually.

[–] AGD4@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is this one here twice?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because like most turboposters, cm0002 is too lazy to delete their duplicates. Damn doubledippers.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bring this up when people talk about how "hard" game development is.

20 years ago, games were being made in 12 months, by 30 people, with tools that people today would consider to be unreasonably slow, with even less detail than they would consider acceptable. Getting a workable prototype could easily take months, and storage space was severely limited.

Under all those restrictions, we got the greatest video games of all time.

Nowadays, its not uncommon for game studios to have over 500 people. Tools are extremely user friendly and fast. Someone could make art assets with 10x the detail than before in less than a 5th of the time. There is basically no storage limit. Getting a workable prototype takes weeks, if that.

And for tall that? Games take 6 years, and release as buggy unfinished messes. The budget is bloated by marketing costs and too many people on payroll. How many games under these conditions will go on to be among the greats of the 90s-10s? Not enough.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Shocking that a barrier of entry would allow only the most dedicated and talented and out of box thinkers do something that ends up worthwhile and now any mouth breather can get a job at ubisoft and vibe code.

Same reason why medium format photography looks good, a snap costs dollars, the camera costs thousand, only the most dedicated would sink time and money into it

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If something is 40 times smaller than another thing, what is the reference point for how small the original thing is?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago