this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
100 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

4832 readers
120 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 months ago

These products exist to collect data to train models. Every other function they perform is secondary.

People are paying hundreds for these, and then they're paying the companies with their data, over and over again. Never before has an industry been able to have such spin on a product.

It's effectively paying a company for the ability to give them unpaid labor.

[–] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 15 points 4 months ago

What a goddamn surprise! surprised_pikachu.jpg

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If anyone's wondering, Ray-Bans are not cool anymore

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Raybans never were cool. They're just an expensive brand name propped up by fashion.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Raybans used to be the cheap gas station sunnies. They were cool then and $25 a pair.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Fucking Luxottica buying up all the brands. How has the EU not broken them up yet?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Morons sending their life details to Meta for well over a decade: So?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Although I’d never use them to shoot anything sensitive, I would be pretty outraged to discover that Meta is capturing manual video recordings.

I would be pretty surprised if they didn't capture manual video recordings. Whatever moron actually bought those glasses consented to it in their vague terms of service anyways, and it's free data they can sell and use for targeted advertising.