this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1864 readers
851 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/51708185

Archived

China’s progress in building a modern economy, evident in its kung-fu fighting robots and self-parking cars, is hitting limits as a downturn in its housing industry drags on, small businesses suffer and young people struggle to find jobs.

The gap between Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s high-tech, artificial intelligence-driven ambitions and the hard realities of slowing growth is the backdrop for the annual meeting of the country’s largely ceremonial national legislature, the National People’s Congress, which begins Thursday.

During the meetings, which draw about 3,000 deputies to Beijing, top leaders will outline China’s annual target for growth and the congress will endorse a five-year blueprint of policy priorities until 2030.

“What we’ll see is the trade-off between whether it’s going to be industry and tech, or looking after domestic demand,” said Alexander Davey, an analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies. “These are the two priorities that are juggling for Xi Jinping right now.”

China’s economy is losing momentum

In a city in southern China’s Guangdong, families were cutting back on big purchases during last month’s Lunar New Year holidays. Even for auspicious houseplants like orchids, used as a symbol of abundance and prosperity, prices were slashed by as much as 40% from last year.

The penny pinching has small business owners complaining about hard times.

[...]

The relatively robust pace of growth was supported by strong manufacturing as exports surged, despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff hikes and other disruptions to trade.

[...]

“Hitting the 2025 growth target is hardly reassuring as the Chinese economy is losing growth momentum, with rising imbalances and enormous structural problems being papered over by a surge in export-driven growth,” Eswar Prasad, a professor of economics and trade policy at Cornell University, told The Associated Press in emailed comments.

[...]

A downturn in China’s housing market began several years ago and piecemeal efforts to revive the industry have made only fitful progress. Dozens of property developers defaulted on their debts as authorities cracked down on excessive borrowing. With overall home prices down 20% or more from 2021, a recovery remains elusive.

The meltdown in one of the country’s biggest industries eliminated hundreds of thousands of jobs and with 12.7 million graduates entering the job market this year, more than 16% of young Chinese are unemployed. Some just are giving up and opting out of the rat race, or “lying flat.”

Families whose main assets are their homes have grown cautious about spending, weakening consumer demand and confounding longstanding efforts to shift the economy to greater reliance on domestic investment.

[...]

China sticks to exports

Reliance on exports is what help keeps China’s economy buzzing, at least for now. China recorded a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025, as exports kept its factories humming. Despite the China-U.S. trade war, it has been shipping more to regions including Europe and Latin America. But it’s facing pushback from its trading partners.

Under leader Xi, China has prioritized developing advanced technologies such as AI, robotics, computer chips, electric vehicles and renewable energy. Massive state support has companies churning out more EVs, TVs, solar panels and other products than China and its trading partners need.

“To achieve those goals, the government is going to have to continue to provide subsidies and preferential support for high-tech and strategic industries,” said Leah Fahy, a China economist at Capital Economics. “(That) will, in turn, continue to fuel overcapacity.”

[...]

Over the past few decades, China’s transformation into a manufacturing superpower was underpinned by booming construction of homes, office buildings, roads, ports and railways. But tech supply chains are narrower, providing fewer jobs. So the trickle down effect is much weaker, said Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING Bank.

“If anything, the more successful the so-called future industries become, the more they will draw resources away from the traditional sectors that still provide the bulk of employment and livelihoods for most people,” said Henry Gao, a professor of law at Singapore Management University.

[...]

Xi is expected to consolidate more power

The annual congress is an impressive show. Thousands of delegates fill the Great Hall of the People in central Beijing. A military band performs and delegates from various ethnic groups attend in traditional clothing.

For all the pomp, the meeting is largely a set piece. The congress lasts only one week and its near-unanimous votes on the final day formalize decisions made ahead of time by party leaders. It’s a show of unity reaffirming the polices and direction they have set.

Increasingly that leadership has centered on one person, Xi, who has consolidated power since taking the helm in 2012. Now 72, he is one of modern China’s most powerful leaders. Some analysts think Xi will emulate Mao Zedong, the revolutionary leader who founded communist China, and rule for life.

Annual reports presented at the congress are replete with references to the party’s crucial role, “with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core.”

[...]

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blueworld@piefed.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

And China, even withwirh their downturn is the player the US should be focused on. Fuck Iran. If anyone remember that old adage that Yamamoto was worried about with the US, being an industrial might capable of pivoting faster than Japan could even imagine. This is now China and not the US. We can build one carrier at a time, they have built 3 in a similar time. They have built an entire interstate and high-speed rail system in twenty years or so. Their military isn't the professional capability of the US, but they keep stealing plans and buying trainers so they might be in a few years, and they are massive.

Oh and they want Taiwan. As in Xi has said we will invade Taiwan to get it back.

So why the fuck is the US playing with Iran when it was self-destructing? Grrrr.

[–] blueworld@piefed.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago

I wouldn't say it is a different argument. China is using this for its propaganda, portraying itself as a 'democracy' and stable government valuing the rule of law. But this is not reality. Beijing just uses Trump's actions for vindication, although China has long been a dictatorship long before Trump.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know what Trump exactly wants in Venezuela and Iran, of course, but the wars here and there hit China massively.

Both Venezuela, the country with the largest known oil reserves, and Iran are (were?) ideal partners for China's global business model built on commodity-based lending. It works quite simple: a Chinese bank close to its government loans the money, the borrower required to sell commodities to a buyer in China, and the commodities proceeds will then be redirected to the bank service the loan. As these trades often occur at predefined prices, China benefits not only by gaining political influence in the selling country - often politically isolated and whose primary source of income is the commodity - but also by making itself a bit independent form fluctuating oil prices.

China has similar deals with a wide range of countries to whom it provides loans for commodities: in Zimbabwe China purchases platinum with such agreements, in Zambia cobalt and copper, in Ghana bauxite.

In Venezuela, the China Development Bank financed the loans for the government in Caracas. The commodity purchase contract involved Venezuela's state-owned oil company Petróleos de Venezuela SA and a Chinese state-owned oil purchaser. The loan is then being repaid by the proceeds from Petróleos de Venezuela SA’s revenue stream from oil sales.

Venezuela is the largest borrower of this Chinese state-backed lending scheme in South America and the fourth largest globally. Between 2000 and 2023, China granted loans totaling USD 95 billion to Venezuela via this scheme, which is roughly 90% of China's total loan volume to Venezuela, according to AidData.

Amidst the current turmoils, however, the supposed convenience has a hefty price as China's credit risk is highly concentrated in a single commodity - in Venezuela's case, oil. Any fundamental change in Venezuela's oil industry would inevitably effect repayment terms (and enforcement conditions) of Caracas's debt to Beijing.

The situation in Iran is similar. China has been buying cheap oil form sanction-hit Iran for a long time. China accounts for more than 80% of Iran’s maritime crude oil exports, and Iranian oil accounts for 13% of China's oil imports. If Iran is forced to shut the Street of Hormuz, it has a much wider impact as 45% of China's (and 20% of the world's) oil and gas supply is shipped through this small lane in the gulf.

For a short period of time, China may be able to even benefit from a possible oil scarcity. It has bought a huge stockpile and could be able to sell its refined oil to others at a reasonable price. But Beijing has no reason to celebrate as this will be short-term. In the long run, the situation will cause a lot of troubles for China.

This is not to say that the US is deliberately aiming at China. I don't understand what the current administration is doing as Trump appears to contradict himself perpetually. But the impact on China is tremendous imho, at least this is how I interpret the data.

I apologize for the long comment.

[–] blueworld@piefed.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I entirely agree with your points.

A. that China has been using BRI as well as other trade schemes as soft power in both Venezuela and Iran.

B. That China has taken some risk in it's investments given the near single source economies both Venezuela and Iran have.

C. The closing of the Strait of Hormuz, even temporarily, will have knock on impacts on China internally and with it's external influence.

Having said that given China's balance of trade and overall finance capacity and strategic position, if either Iran or Venezuela default on loans I think they can sustain it and likely get something out of it in the long run (terms you mentioned). Evergrande's default at some where between 300-450 blillion was far more of a direct impact as a single company and they were capable of weathering that, while also dealing with other housing builders similarly defaulting.

Further as you have noted, Beijing is strategic in it's stockpiling. It also is in it's purchasing strategy. Russia is desperate to sell more oil an even though it might go above 20% of China's market share this year, that's an option. Which is to say China has created a situation where it has options and isn't beholden to the strait of Hormuz. It will certainly have an impact, but I would be surprised if China doesn't come out stronger, some how.

All of this is really in support of your argument as we both agree there's a WTF element to this with Trump. There is no coherence. Where as we can speculate in a general direction with China as it's not entirely predictable, but it has been somewhat consistent in areas lately.

I mostly commented in exasperation at the incoherent, nonsensical, asinine, people in power and those behind them. I'd much rather have a conversation with you than let my rage take me when considering them. (Also frankly I like long comments.)