It says passive investing, tracking stocks has quadrupled, so all that money going to the same set of stocks has increased their value, so they are overvalued.
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)
news
726 readers
796 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
While ignoring that it's still percentage based only approx half of total market volume (depending on source and exact definition).
And"the same stock" are based on market development so the passive investor are simply multipliers.
Sounds again to me like "market crash guru 1500" who correctly predicts the next crash and only needs one prediction per month for that until realization.
Interesting take.
IIRC, this was the main "bubble panic" in the years leading up to the COVID pandemic (though its since been replaced by general gov spending unease and then AI as biggest worry).
Man was deffo alive for the subprime and dotcom bubbles popping so idk how he can look at AI's bubble and not think "Oh this one is different."