this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

858 readers
7 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The health minister says a doctor using an artificial intelligence scribe tool is able to see, on average, one additional patient per shift.

Simeon Brown has announced every emergency department in the country now has access to the tool, which records consultations and generates draft clinical notes, referral letters and follow-up summaries.

Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (ASMS) vice-president Dr Sylvia Boys said she was concerned about how secure the artificial intelligence scribe tool was.

It could also misunderstand what was said, Boys added, especially when it came to an examination.

"You have to verbalise what you're finding at the time, and that difference between patient speak with the patient in front of you and the medical diagnosis, AI can sometimes misinterpret what is going on."

It also could not differentiate between patients when a clinician was dealing with multiple, Boys said.

"Within the ED environment, we also have multiple interruptions, and they have to step out of the room, be talked to about other patients, and so separating out what is going on with one patient and what is going on with another - with an IT system that is listening to both - can be troublesome as well."

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is one area where I think AI can make a real contribution; I get that there are major privacy concerns etc...but step back from the detail for a sec and imagine what this could be.

A caveat: I am an AI skeptic, through and through. A lot of the places AI is being shoehorned into are idiotic.

Saying the above, I would love something like this for my sparkies and fitters; rather than them making notes about what they did during the day, they just wear a headset and quickly make a voice note about they are doing, which is auto transcribed and loaded against the work order, when they go to the stores the headset picks up a beacon and the assistant asks what they are getting and what job it is for. So many issues are caused at stores by stuff not being booked out correctly. At the end of the day; they review and correct for 10-15 minutes to ensure accuracy; rather than sitting around trying to remember what they did 8 hrs ago, after 4 breakdowns and six interruptions.

It is unreasonable to have every person with a personal assistant; but basically every job would benefit from having an assistant.

Preferably this would all happen on device; and the reviewed text is all that is sent. Trust would be the biggest hurdle; especially for the teams I work with, a lot of tech skeptics....but they all use facebook!!!!

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

So the idea of rolling this out firstly in medical contexts is insane, but I agree there is big potential here.

Is "AI" (as in agentic LLM) really necessary here thought?

Imagine exactly your setup, but instead of some LLM you instead have locations of jobs in your system before you start, press a button on your headset or whatever while on site and say things to be logged against the job. Speech to text can generate the text, GPS can apply it to the right job, and key words can be used if you need to do something that isn't just logging notes.

Surely we can go a long way to what you describe before trying to plug an LLM in?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They refer to it as "Heidi" in the article, which I'm guessing is Heidi Health.

Great, an AI that records what it thinks it hears and puts it on the file of the patient it thinks the doctor is talking to. No chance for a privacy breach here.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How long do you think it will be before this ends up in court?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

They will need an actual breach, and it depends on what the uptake is as it's specifically worded as being available not actually being used. And unfortunately the privacy commissioner doesn't seem to investigate unless there is actual harm (which I found when one NZ website gave/sold me email to another - it was a unique relay email hence why I knew what happened, but also that means I didn't suffer any harm).

Still, if it becomes widespread we will surely at least have a big media shitshow if not an actual court case within the year.